Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:35:10.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical Detection of Band Gap Variations Due to Ordering in Ga0.47In0.53As on InP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

D. J. Arent
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401–3393
K. A. Bertness
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401–3393
Sarah R. Kurtz
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401–3393
M. Bode
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401–3393
J. M. Olson
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401–3393
Get access

Abstract

A reduction in the optical energy gap of more than 65 meV has been observed in In0.53Ga0.47 As grown on (100) InP by atmospheric pressure metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy. The band gap energies were deduced from room temperature photocurrent spectroscopic measurements, accounting for differences in composition and strain. Spontaneous CuPt type ordering of In and Ga atoms on the (111) subplanes of the InGaAs2 was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy. Superlattice signatures in the transmission micrographs were observed only for samples with associated reduced band gap energies, and were confirmed by visible double periodicity in high resolution images. In0.53Ga0.47 As was grown under a variety of conditions, some which promoted ordering. In general, lower growth temperatures and moderate (∼4 μ/hr) growth rates promoted a greater degree of ordering and reduction of the band gap energy. The influence of growth conditions on the ordered structure is considered within the context of current theories.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Kurtz, Sarah R., Kibbler, A., and Olson, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 623, (1990).Google Scholar
2 Kurtz, Sarah R., Olson, J. M. and Kibbler, A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 1922, (1990)Google Scholar
3 Boguslawski, P., Semicond Sci Technol, 6, 953962, (1991).Google Scholar
4 Wei, S.-H and Zunger, A., App. Phys. Lett. 56, 662, (1990).Google Scholar
5 Nakayama, H. and Fujita, H., Inst. Phys. Conf‥ Ser. No 79: Chpt. 4, p 289, (1986).Google Scholar
6 Shahid, M.A., Mahajan, S., Laughlin, D.E. and Cox, H.M., Phys Rev Lett 58, 2567, (1987).Google Scholar
7 Shahid, M.A. and Mahajan, S., Phys Rev B 38, 1344, (1988).Google Scholar
8 Kuan, T.S., Wang, W. I., and Wilkie, E.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 51, (1987).Google Scholar
9 Chin, A., Chang, T.Y., Ourmazd, A. and Monberg, E.M., Appl Phys Lett 58, 968, (1991).Google Scholar
10 Ueda, O., Nakata, Y., Nakamura, T. and Fujii, T., J. Cryst. Growth 115, 375, (1991).Google Scholar
11 Seong, T. Y., Norman, A. G., Hutchison, J. L., Brooker, G. R., Cullis, A. G., Bass, S. J. and Taylor, L. L., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No 117, 463, (1991).Google Scholar
12 Fukui, T. and Saito, H., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 23 (8), L521, (1984).Google Scholar
13 Gerard, J. M., Marzin, J. Y., d'Anterroches, C., Soucail, B., and Voisin, P., Surf. Sci. 229, 456, (1990).Google Scholar
14 Bassignana, I. C., Miner, C. J. and Puetz, N., J. Appl. Phys. 65 (11), 4299, (1989).Google Scholar
15 Pankove, J., Optical Processes in Semiconductors. (Dover Publications, Inc. New York, 1957).Google Scholar
16 Wang, T. Y. and Stringfellow, G. B., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 344, (1990)Google Scholar
17 Leys, M.R., Titze, H., Samuelson, L., and Petruzzello, J., J. Cryst. Growth 93, 504, (1988).Google Scholar
18 Kobayashi, N. and Kobayashi, Y., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 30, L1699, (1991).Google Scholar
19 Tmar, M., Gabriel, A., Chatillon, C., and Ansara, I., J. Cryst. Growth 68, 557, (1984).Google Scholar
20 Tmar, M., Gabriel, A., Chatillon, C., and Ansara, I., J. Cryst. Growth 69, 421, (1984).Google Scholar
21 Kobayashi, N. and Kobayashi, Y., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 30, L1699, (1991).Google Scholar
22 Larsen, C. A., Ki, S. J., Buchan, N. I., Stringfellow, G. B., and Brown, D. W., J. Cryst. Growth 102, 126, (1990).Google Scholar
23 Stringfellow, G. B. and Chen, G. S., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 9, 2181, (1991).Google Scholar