Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:45:04.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Correlation of the Hardness of B2 Compounds with Point Defect Concentrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

L. M. Pike
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Dept., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI53706
Y. A. Chang
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Dept., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI53706
C. T. Liu
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

Point defects such as vacancies and anti-site atoms are known to strongly affect the mechanical properties of B2 compounds. The variations in the hardness of these compounds with composition and quenching temperature can often be correlated with the concentrations of these point defects. Simple themodynamic models using a quasi-chemical approach can be used to estimate the concentrations of point defects with composition and temperature. These estimates can often be supported by experimental methods. Knowledge of the concentrations of defects can then be compared to the variations in hardness using solid solution strengthening models. A consistent relationship is found for several B2 compounds. The hardening rates of vacancies are found to be greater than those of anti-site atoms. B2 compounds having the anti-structure defect structure (AuZn, FeCo) are investigated as well as those with the triple-defect structure (FeAl, NiAl, CoAl).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fleischer, R. L., J. Mater. Res. 8, 59 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Vedula, K. and Khadkikar, P.S., in High Temperature Aluminides and Intennetallics. edited by Wang, S.H., Liu, C.T., Pope, D.P., and Steigler, J.O. (TMS Publication, Warrendale, PA, 1990) pp. 197217.Google Scholar
3. Fleischer, R. L., in The Strengthening of Metals, edited by Peckner, D. (Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, 1964), pp. 93140.Google Scholar
4. Chang, Y. A., Pike, L. M., Liu, C. T.,, Bilbrey, A. R. and Stone, D. S., Intermetallics, 1, (1993) 107.Google Scholar
5. Chang, Y. A. and Neumann, J. P., Prog. SolidState Chem. 14, 221301 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Neumann, J. P., Acta Metall. 28 (1980) 1165–70.Google Scholar
7. Arslan, F., Bell, H. B., and Downie, D. B., Met. Sci., 12 (1978) 198.Google Scholar
8. Ipser, H., Neumann, J. P., and Chang, Y. A., Monatsh. Chem. 107 (1976) 1471.Google Scholar
9. Neumann, J. P., Chang, Y. A. and Lee, C. M., Acta Metall., 24 (1976) 593.Google Scholar
10. Pike, L. M., Chang, Y.A., and Liu, C. T., in Processing. Properties, and Applications of Iron Aluminides. edited by Schneibel, J. H. and Crimp, M. A. (TMS Publication, Warrendale, PA, 1994) pp 217–29.Google Scholar
11. Westbrook, J., J. Electochem. Soc. 103 (1956) 54.Google Scholar
12. Nagpal, P. and Baker, I., Metall. Trans. 21A (1990) 2281.Google Scholar