Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:43:13.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observation of Ge2Sb2Te5 thin film phase transition behavior according to the number of cycles using Transmission Electron Microscope and Scanning Probe Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Hyunjung Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering, 373-1 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Korea, Republic of, +82-42-869-4155, +82-42-869-3310
Sikyung Choi
Affiliation:
[email protected], Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering, 373-1 Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Korea, Republic of
Sukhoon Kang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Seoul National University, School of Material Science and Engineering, San 56-1 Shillim-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Korea, Republic of
Kyuhwan Oh
Affiliation:
[email protected], Seoul National University, School of Material Science and Engineering, San 56-1 Shillim-dong, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Korea, Republic of
Soonyong Kweon
Affiliation:
[email protected], Chungju National University, Materials Science & Engineering, 123, Geomdan-ri, Iryu-myeon, Chungju, 380-702, Korea, Republic of
Get access

Abstract

Recently, the development of information technology (IT) increases the demands of memory devices. Phase change random access memory (PRAM), based on the reversible phase change of the chalcogenide alloy, Ge2Sb2Te5, is widely regarded as a favourite candidate for the next generation memory. Because of PRAM has a simple cell structure with high scalability; it is non-volatile, has a relatively high read/write operation speed (Â50ns). The PRAM operation relies on the fact that chalcogenide-based materials can be reversible switched from an amorphous phase to a crystalline state by an external electrical current. It is important to study the electrical property with set/reset cycles, since film thickness shrinkage occurs with the phase transition.

In this work, we fabricated the 100nm amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 thin film on TiN/Ti/Si substrate using dc-magnetron sputtering. The 50X50§2 isolated Ge2Sb2Te5 cell was lithographed by the lift-off pattern and wet etching. And TiN top electrode was deposited using pattern align process at room temperature after the SiO2 insulator CMP. Phase transition behavior with the set/reset cycle was observed using I-V measurement and transmission electron microscope (TEM) on isolated Ge2Sb2Te5 cell. The set/reset programming was operated using tungsten SPM tip which was fabricated using focused ion beam (FIB) lithography. I-V curve which was observed by the I-V probe clearly showed that the phase transition was occurred by applying the electric field through the I-V probe. The resistivity difference between amorphous and crystal state was more than 102. After the phase transition, it was also demonstrated with transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis. For the preparation of TEM specimen of the amorphous and crystalline cell, focused ion beam (FIB) lithography was adopted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lai, Stefan and Lowrey, Tyler, IEDM 36.5.1, 803 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Senkader, S. and Wright, C. D., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 504 (2004).10.1063/1.1633984Google Scholar
3. Pedersen, T. P. Leervad, Kalb, J., Njoroge, W. K., Wamwangi, D., and Wuttig, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3597 (2001).10.1063/1.1415419Google Scholar
4. Jaeger, Richard C., “Introduction to microelectronic fabrication” (Modular Series on Solid State Devices, second edition), Chapter 2.Google Scholar
5. Cheng, Huai-Yu, Jong, Chao-An, Lee, Chain-Ming, and Chin, Tsung-Shune, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 41, 1031 (2005).10.1109/TMAG.2004.842136Google Scholar
6. Friedrich, I., Weidenhof, V., Njoroge, W., Franz, P., and Wuttig, M, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 4130 (2000).10.1063/1.373041Google Scholar
7. Walter Njoroge, K., Wöltgens, Han-Willem, and Wuttig, Matthias, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A20(1), 230 (2002).10.1116/1.1430249Google Scholar
8. Lugstein, A., Bertagnolli, E., Kranz, C., Kueng, A., and Mizaikoff, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 349 (2002).10.1063/1.1492304Google Scholar
9. Kado, H. and Tohda, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2961 (1995).10.1063/1.114243Google Scholar
10. Gotoh, Tamihiro, Sugawara, Kentaro, and Tanaka, Keiji, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 299–302, 968 (2002).10.1016/S0022-3093(01)01061-4Google Scholar
11. Gidon, S., Lemonnier, O., Rolland, B., Bichet, O., and Dressler, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6392 (2004).10.1063/1.1834718Google Scholar
12. Overwijk, M. H. F., van den Heuvel, F. C., and Bulle-Lieuwma, C. W. T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11 (6), 2021 (1993).10.1116/1.586537Google Scholar
13. Lide, David R., “CRC handbook of chemistry and physics” (CRC Press LLC, 78th edition), pp. 1293, 12–191.Google Scholar
14. Tang, Xiaolin (Charlie), Nail, Steven L., and Pikal, Michael J., Pharmaceutical Research. 22, 685 (2005).10.1007/s11095-005-2501-2Google Scholar