Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:25:54.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observation of Diffusion Behavior of Trace Elements in Hardened Cement Pastes by LA-ICP-MS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Taiji Chida
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2-11-1, Iwado-Kita, Komae, Tokyo 201-8511, Japan
Daisuke Sugiyama
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2-11-1, Iwado-Kita, Komae, Tokyo 201-8511, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Diffusion coefficients of iodine (I), cesium (Cs) and strontium (Sr) in solid cement blocks of ordinary portland cement (OPC) and low-heat portland cement containing 30 wt% fly ash (FAC) are measured by in-diffusion experiment. By using “laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry”, the penetration profiles of trace elements by diffusion were obtained quantitatively in cement solids. The apparent diffusion coefficients of the near-surface of the cement samples were estimated to be about 10-13 m2 s-1for I, Cs and Sr. Lower diffusion coefficients were observed for FAC than those obtained for OPC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 TRU Coordination Office (Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute and The Federation of Electric Power Companies), Progress Report on Disposal Concept for TRU Waste in Japan, JNC TY 1400 2000-002, TRU TR-2000-02 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Hattendorf, B., Latkoczy, C., and Günther, D., Anal. Chem., 75, 341A (2003).Google Scholar
3 Tomlinson, E., Schruver, I. D., Jones, A. P., and Vanhaecke, F., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 69, No. 19, 4719 (2005).Google Scholar
4 Orihashi, Y., Hirata, T., and Tanji, K., J. Mineral. Petrol. Sci. (JMPS), 98, 109 (2003).Google Scholar
5 Wayne, D. M., Diaz, T. A., Fairhurst, R. J., Orndorff, R. L., and Pete, D. V., Appl. Geochim., 21, 1410 (2006).Google Scholar
6 Heinrich, C. A., Pettke, T., Halter, W. E., Aigner-Torres, M., Audétat, A., Günther, D., and Hattendorf, B., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 67, No. 18, 3473 (2003).Google Scholar
7 Zedgenizov, D. A., Rege, S., Griffin, W. L., Kagi, H., and Shatsky, V. S., Chem. Geol., 240, 151 (2007).Google Scholar
8 Crank, J., Mathematics of Diffusion 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, London, 1975), p. 20.Google Scholar
9 Atkinson, A. and Nickerson, A. K., J. Mat. Sci., 19, 3068 (1984).Google Scholar
10 Haga, K., Sutou, S., Hironaga, M., Tanaka, S., and Nagasaki, S., Cement Concr. Res., 35, 1764 (2005).Google Scholar
11 Taylor, H. F. W., Cement Chemistry 2nd ed. (Thomas Telford Services Ltd., London, 1997), p. 291.Google Scholar
12 Atkinson, A. and Nickerson, A. K., Nucl. Technol., 81, 100 (1988).Google Scholar
13 Idemitsu, K., Furuya, H., Tatsumi, R., Yonezawa, s., Inagaki, Y., and Sato, S. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, edited by Abrajano, T. Jr., and Johnson, L. H., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 212, Boston, MA, 1991) pp. 427432.Google Scholar