No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Nuclear Reaction Analysis Technique to Determine The Penetration of Hydrogenic Species into Glasses Exposed to Leaching Solutions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2011
Abstract
Nuclear reaction analysis is discussed as a method for determining the distribution of deuterium beneath the surfaces of glasses exposed to heavy water solutions for various times and temperatures. Limited examples of both conventional depth profiling for deuterium and a new technique for deuterium mapping are presented. The possible use of deuterium mapping for investigating the kinetics and mechanisms of the leaching of glasses is discussed.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985
References
3.
Plodinec, M. J., Jantzen, C. M., and Wicks, G. G., “Stability of Radioactive Waste Glasses Assessed from Hydration Thermodynamics,” presented at the Annual Meeting of the Materials Research Society, Boston, MA, 14–17 Nov. 1983.Google Scholar
4.
Wallace, R. M. and Wicks, G. G., “Leaching Chemistry of Defense Borosilicate Glass,” Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, 15, Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI; editor, Brookins, D. G., North-Holland, New York (1983), pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
5.
Sullivan, T. M., “Predictive Modeling of Diffusional Processes Within the Hydrated Layer of Vitrified Nuclear Waste Forms,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL (1984), 165 pp.Google Scholar
6.
Plodinec, M. J., Jantzen, C. M., and Wicks, G. G., “Thermodynamic Approach to Prediction of the Stability of Proposed Radwaste Glasses,” Advances in Ceramics, 8, Nuclear Waste Management; editors, Wicks, F. G. and Ross, W. A., American Ceramic Society, Inc., Columbus, OH (1984), pp. 491–495.Google Scholar
7.
Harvey, K. B., Litke, C. D., and Boase, C. A., “Diffusion-based Leaching Models for Glassy Waste Forms,” Advances in Ceramics, 8, Nuclear Waste Management; editors, Wicks, F. G. and Ross, W. A., American Ceramic Society, Inc., Columbus, OH (1984), pp. 496–507.Google Scholar
8.
Pescatore, C. and Machiels, A. J., “Mechanistic Approach to Modeling of Nuclear Waste Form Leaching,” Advances in Ceramics, 8, Nuclear Waste Management; editors, Wicks, F. G. and Ross, W. A., American Ceramic Society, Inc., Columbus, OH (1984), pp. 508–518.Google Scholar
11.
Williams, P., Evans, C. A. Jr., Grossbeck, M. L., and Birnbaum, H. H., “Ion Microprobe Analysis for Niobium Hydride in Hydrogen-Embrittled Niobium,”
Analytical Chem., 48 (1976), p. 964.Google Scholar
12.
Pantano, C. G., “Surface and In-Depth Analysis of Glass and Ceramics,”
Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 60 (1981), p. 1154.Google Scholar
13.
Tsong, I. S. T., Houser, C. A., White, W. B., and Power, G. L., “Glass Leaching Studies by Sputter-Induced Photon Spectrometry (SIPS),”
J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 38 & 39 (1980), p. 649.Google Scholar
14.
Knickerbocker, S. H., Joshi, S. B., and Brown, S. D., “A Study of Water in Glass by an Autoradiographic Method that Utilizes Tritiated Water,” Advances in Materials Characterization, Materials Science Research, Vol. 15; editors, Rossington, D. R., Condrate, R. A., and Snyder, R. L., Plenum, New York (1983), pp. 571–589.Google Scholar