Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:21:47.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Novel AFM-MEA Platform for Studying the Real Time Mechano-Electrical Behavior of Cardiac Myocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jose Francisco Saenz Cogollo ,
Mariateresa Tedesco ,
Sergio Martinoia  and
Roberto Raiteri
Jose Francisco Saenz Cogollo
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, Universita' di Genova, Department of Biophysical and Electronic Engineering – DIBE, Genova, Italy
Mariateresa Tedesco
Affiliation:
[email protected], Universita' di Genova, Department of Biophysical and Electronic Engineering – DIBE, Genova, Italy
Sergio Martinoia
Affiliation:
[email protected], Universita' di Genova, Department of Biophysical and Electronic Engineering – DIBE, Genova, Italy
Roberto Raiteri
Affiliation:
[email protected], Universita' di Genova, Department of Biophysical and Electronic Engineering – DIBE, Genova, Italy
Get access

Abstract

We present a novel experimental platform based on a combined Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Micro-Electrode Array (MEA) set-up. We have used it to measure minimal changes in the morphological/mechanical properties of electrically active cell cultures as well as to measure the changes in the extracellular electrical activity when a single cell is stimulated by means of the AFM tip. In particular, we studied the dynamical changes in cell elasticity of embryonic rat cardiac myocytes along the contraction-relaxation cycle. Applying high load indentations, we also recorded the effects of mechanical stimulations on the cell electrophysiology. The dynamic elastic modulus of the cell related to the contraction-relaxation cycle reveals a temporal behavior that closely follows the changes in cell height. Observed values of dynamic elastic modulus at a maximum indentation depth of 1500nm varied between 8.93 ± 0.78 kPa during systolic (contraction) phase and 4.26 ± 0.47 kPa during diastolic (relaxation) phase. Induced electrophysiological responses were observed when applying loads in the range 40-150 nN. The probability P of recording an induced electrical response (P = 0.16 for a maximum load of 100nN) increased with the maximum applied load. Pulling-like stimulations due to the tip-cell adhesion could also evocate electrical responses.

Keywords

scanning probe microscopy (SPM)nano-indentationbiomedical
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1261: Symposium U – Scanning Probe Microscopy - Frontiers in NanoBio Science , 2010 , 1261-U04-09
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Azeloglu, E.U. and Costa, K.D.. Am. J. Physiol. Heart. Circ. Physiol. 298 (3), H853–H860 (2010).Google Scholar
2 Dyachenko, V. Husse, B. Rueckschloss, U. and Isenberg, G.. Cell Calcium, 45(1), 38–54 (2009).Google Scholar
3 Parker, K. K. and Ingber, D.E.. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 362(1484), 1267–1279 (2007).Google Scholar
4 Domke, J. Parak, W. J. George, M. Gaub, H. E. and Radmacher, M.. European Biophysics Journal, 28(3), 179–186 (1999).Google Scholar
5 Egert, U. and Meyer, T. Practical Methods in Cardiovascular Research. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005). pp. 432–453.Google Scholar
6 Ravens, U. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 82(1), 255–266 (2003).Google Scholar
7 Kohl, P. Bollensdorff, C. and Garny, A. Experimental physiology, 91(2), 307–321 (2006).Google Scholar
8 Sader, J.E. Larson, I. Mulvaney, P. and White, L. Review of Scientific Instruments, 66 (7), 3789–3798 (1995).Google Scholar
9 Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G.M. Journal of Materials Research, 7(6), 1564–1583 (1992).Google Scholar
10 VanLandingham, M. R. Villarrubia, J. S. Guthrie, W. F. and Meyers, G. F. Macromolecular Symposia, 167(1), 15–44 (2001).Google Scholar