Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T21:50:20.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nmr Study of Sodium Ion Mobility in a Single Crystal of Na β”-Alumina and Water Effects in Polycrystalline Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Cecil E. Hayes  and
David C. Ailion
Cecil E. Hayes
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
David C. Ailion
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Get access

Abstract

We measured the temperature dependence of T1 in a Mg-stabilized single crystal of Na β”-alumina. A comparison with earlier measurements on Li-stabilized polycrystalline samples indicates that, below 500K, the sodium ion kinetics are not directly affected by the stabilizing element. Above 500K our measured T1 shows a dependence on sample composition. Observations of NMR linewidth and signal intensity vs. water content indicate that, at low water concentration (< 2%), all sodium is in contact with water in its conduction plane; at higher water concentrations, the additional water may be forming complexes with some of the sodium.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 3: Symposium – Nuclear and Electron Resonance Spectroscopies Applied to Materials Science , 1980 , 283
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Fast Ion Transport in Solids, Vashishta, P., Mundy, J.N. and Shenoy, G.K. eds. (North Holland, New York 1979).Google Scholar
2. Bailey, W.C., Story, H.S. and Roth, W.L. in: Superionic Conductors, Mahan, G.D. and Roth, W.L. eds. (Plenum Press, New York 1976) p. 370.Google Scholar
3. Hayes, C.E. and Ailion, D.C. in Ref. 1, p. 297.Google Scholar
4. Ailion, D.C. and Hayes, C.E. in Ref. 1, p. 301.Google Scholar
5. Bailey, W.C., Story, H.S., Ochadlick, A.R. Jr. and Farrington, G.C. in Ref. 1, p. 281.Google Scholar
6. Abragam, A., Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1961) p. 36.Google Scholar
7. Clark, W.G., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 35, 316 (1964).Google Scholar
8. Bates, J.B., private communication.Google Scholar
9. Miller, G.R., McEntire, B.J., Hadnagy, T.D., Rasmussen, J.R., Gorden, R.S. and Virkar, A.V. in Ref. 1, p. 83.Google Scholar
10. Bloembergen, N., Purcell, E.M. and Pound, R.V., Phys. Rev. 73, 679 (1948).Google Scholar
11. See Ref. 6, pp. 232–241.Google Scholar
12. Cole, T., Weber, N. and Hunt, T.K. in Ref. 1, p. 277.Google Scholar
13. Farrington, G.C. and Briant, J.L. in Ref. 1, p. 395.Google Scholar
14. Boilot, J.P., Collin, G., Colomban, Ph. and Comes, R., preprint.Google Scholar
15. Treatment with methanol was suggested by Dr. Cole, T..Google Scholar
16. Foster, L.M. and Arbach, G.V., J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 165 (1977).Google Scholar