Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:36:58.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NMR Imaging of Elastomers and Porous Media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Richard A. Komoroski
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Departments of Radiology and Pathology, 4301 West Markham St., Little Rock, AR 72205.
Subhendra N. Sarkar
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Departments of Radiology and Pathology, 4301 West Markham St., Little Rock, AR 72205.
Get access

Abstract

NMR imaging has been applied to some elastomeric materials of industrial interest. The T2s of common elastomers, Particularly after filling and curing, are sufficiently short That spin-echo sequences at submillisecond echo times cannot Produce T2 independent images. The sensitivity to T2 Potentially makes spin echo imaging a good probe of elastomer Blend composition, as demonstrated for a series of filled and Cured cis-polybutadiene, styrene-butadiene rubber blends. The Technique can be used to distinguish good and bad carbon black Dispersion in actual tire tread samples. The configuration of Polyester tire cord, voids, rubber layer boundaries, differences of molecular mobility and composition, and other inhomogeneities can be detected in end-product tire samples. The value of isotropic voxels at 80–100 um and the effect of resolution Relative to pore size are demonstrated on a model, H2O-saturated Porous glass disk of 200-um average pore size. The feasibility of multinuclear NMR imaging for fluid-specific characterization of porous materials such as oil cores is demonstrated for 7Li and 19F

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Listerud, J.M., Sinton, S.W., and Drobny, G.P., Anal. Chem. 61, 23A (1989).Google Scholar
2. Chang, S.J., Olson, J.R., and Wang, P.C., For. Prod. J. 39, 43 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Jenner, C.F., Xia, Y., Eccles, C.D., and Callaghan, P.T., Nature 336, 399 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Kuhn, W., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 29, 1 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chang, C. and Komoroski, R.A., Macromolecules 22, 600 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Weisenberger, L.A. and Koenig, J.L., Appl. Spectrosc. 43, 1117 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Garrido, L., Ackerman, J.L., and Ellingson, W.A., J. Magn. Reson. 88, 340 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Edelstein, W.A., Vinegar, H.J., Tutunjian, P.N., Roemer, P.B., and Mueller, O.M., SPE Paper 18272, 63rd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, Oct. 2–5, 1988.Google Scholar
9. Cory, D.G., Miller, J.B., Turner, R., and Garroway, A.N., Mol. Phys. 70, 331 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Sarkar, S.N. and Komoroski, R.A., unpublished results.Google Scholar
11. Webb, A.G., Jezzard, P., Hall, L.D., and Ng, S., Polym. Commun. 30, 363 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Clough, R.S. and Koenig, J.L., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. 27, 451 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Komoroski, R.A. and Mandelkern, L., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Symp. 54, 201 (1976).Google Scholar
14. Zhou, X., Potter, C.S., Lauterbur, P.C., and Voth, B., Abstracts, Eighth Annual Meeting, Soc. Magn. Reson. Med., 286 (1989).Google Scholar
15. Dechter, J.J., Komoroski, R.A., and Ramaprasad, S., Proc. Soc. Core Analysts, paper #8903, 1989.Google Scholar