Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:59:29.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NMR Characterization of Simulated Hanford Low-Activity Waste Glasses and its use in Understanding Waste form Chemical Durability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. G. Darab ,
J. C. Linehan  and
B. P. McGrail
J. G. Darab
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [1], Richland, WA 99352
J. C. Linehan
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [1], Richland, WA 99352
B. P. McGrail
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [1], Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Magic Angle Spinning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (MAS-NMR) spectroscopy has been used to characterize the structural and chemical environments of B, Al, and Si in model Hanford low-activity waste glasses. The average 29Si NMR peak position was found to systematically change with changing glass composition and structure. From an understanding of the structural roles of Al and B obtained from MAS-NMR experiments, we first developed a model that reliably predicts the distribution of structural units and the average 29Si chemical shift value, δ, based purely on glass composition. A product consistency test (PCT) was used to determine the normalized elemental release (NL) from the prepared glasses. Comparison of the NMR and PCT data obtained from sodium boro-aluminosilicate glasses indicates that a rudimentary exponential relationship exists between the 29Si chemical shift value, and the boron NL value.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 337
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pacific Northwest Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by the Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.Google Scholar
2. Feng, X. and Metzger, T.B.in Aqueous Chemistry and Geochemistry of Oxides, Oxyhydroxides, and Related Materials, eds. Voigt, J.A., Wood, T.E., Bunker, B.C., Casey, W.H., Crossey, L.J. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 432, Pittsburgh, PA 1997), pp. 27–38.Google Scholar
3. Darab, J.G., Feng, X., Linehan, J.C., Smith, P.A., and Roth, I., in Ceramic Transactions, Vol.72 (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1997), pp. 103–110.Google Scholar
4. Feng, X., Hrma, P.R., Westsik, J.H., Brown, N.R., Schweiger, M.J., Li, H., Vienna, J.D., Chen, G., Piepel, G.F., Peeler, D.K., Smith, D.E., Chang, C., Palmer, S.E., Kim, D., Peng, Y., Hahn, W.K., Bakel, A.J., and Ebert, W.L., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report PNNL-10918 (Richland, WA, 1996).Google Scholar
5. Kirkpatrick, R.J. in Spectroscopic Methods in Mineralogy and Geology, ed. Hawthorne, F.C. (Mineralogical Soc. of America, Washington, D.C., 1988), pp. 341–403.Google Scholar
6. Li, H., Darab, J.G., Smith, P.A., Feng, X., and Peeler, D.K. in INMM 36th Annual Proceedings (Inst. for Nuclear Mater. Management, Northbrook, IL, 1995), pp. 460–465.Google Scholar
7. Kohn, S.C., Dupree, R., Mortuza, M.G., and Henderson, C.M.B., American Mineralogist 76 (1991), 309.Google Scholar
8. Yun, Y.H. and Bray, P.J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 27 (1978), 363.Google Scholar
9. Eckert, H., Progress in NMR Spectroscopy 24 (1992), 159.Google Scholar
10. Hecht, H.G.. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
11. Brinker, C.J. and Scherer, G.W.. Sol-Gel Science (Academic Press, New York, 1990).Google Scholar