Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:33:47.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitridation Of Sapphire Substrate Using Remote Plasma Enhanced-Ultrahigh Vacuum Chemical Vapor Deposition At Low Temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Jong-Sik Paek ,
Kyoung-Kook Kim ,
Ji-Myon Lee ,
Dong-Jun Kim ,
Hyo-Gun Kim  and
Seong-Ju Park
Jong-Sik Paek
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 506-712, Korea
Kyoung-Kook Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 506-712, Korea
Ji-Myon Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 506-712, Korea
Dong-Jun Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 506-712, Korea
Hyo-Gun Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 506-712, Korea
Seong-Ju Park
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 506-712, Korea
Get access

Abstract

A remote plasma enhanced-ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition (RPE-UHVCVD) system equipped with a radio frequency-inductively coupled plasma (RF-ICP) which produces the reactive nitrogen species was employed to study the nitridation process at low temperature. The sapphire surface nitridated under various conditions was investigated with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The nitridation process seems to be mostly affected by the RF power even at low temperature since the intensity of the N1s, peak was not dependent on the substrate temperature but on the RF power. The AFM images showed that the protrusion density on the sapphire surface decreased rapidly when the nitridation temperature was decreased. This result suggests that the formation of the protrusions is closely related to the process temperature, indicating that the formation of such protrusions is caused by the change of an elastic strain energy due to the thermal stress. It was possible to nitridate the sapphire surface without protrusion at a very low temperature. The crystallinity of GaN grown at 450 °C was found to be much improved when the sapphire substrate was nitridated at low temperature prior to the GaN layer growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 482 , 1997 , 81
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Vennegues, P., Beaumont, B., Vaille, M., and Gibart, P., J. Cryst. Growth 173, 249 (1997).10.1016/S0022-0248(96)01050-0Google Scholar
2. Grandjean, N., Massies, J., and Leroux, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2071 (1996): N. Grandjean, J. Massies, P. Vennegues, M. Laugt, and M. Leroux, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 643 (1997).10.1063/1.116883Google Scholar
3. Keller, S., Keller, B. P., Wu, Y. -F., Heying, B., Kapolnek, d., Speck, J. S., Mishra, U. K., and DenBaars, S. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1525 (1996).10.1063/1.115687Google Scholar
4. Uchida, K., Watanabe, A., Yano, F., Kouguchi, M., Tanaka, T., and Minagawa, S., J. Appl. Phys. 79, 3487 (1996).10.1063/1.361398Google Scholar
5. Suetsugu, T., Yamazaki, T., Tomabechi, S., Woda, K., Masu, K., Tsubouchi, K., Appl. Surf. Sci. 117/118 540 (1997).10.1016/S0169-4332(97)80139-0Google Scholar
6. Heinlein, C., Grepstad, J., Riechert, H., and Averbeck, R., Materials Science and Engineering B 43, 253 (1997).10.1016/S0921-5107(96)01878-8Google Scholar
7. Taferner, W. T., Bensaoula, A., Kim, E., and Bousetta, A., J. of Cryst. Growth 164, 167 (1996).10.1016/0022-0248(96)00020-6Google Scholar
8. Taylor, J. A. and Rabalais, J. W., J. Chem. Phys. 75 1735 (1981).10.1063/1.442251Google Scholar
9. Yamamoto, A., Tsujino, M., Ohkubo, M., and Hashimoto, A., J. Cryst. Growth 137, 415 (1994).10.1016/0022-0248(94)90979-2Google Scholar
10. Noh, D. Y., Hwu, Y., Kim, H. K., and Hong, M., Phys. Rev. B 51, 4441 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevB.51.4441Google Scholar
11. Kim, C., and Robinson, I. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2358 (1996).10.1063/1.117524Google Scholar
12. Hiramatsu, K., Detchprohm, T., and Akasaki, I., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 1528 (1993).10.1143/JJAP.32.1528Google Scholar