Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T06:31:31.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Technique for Determining Mechanical Property of Polymer/Metal Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

T. Du ,
M. Liu ,
S. Seghi ,
K. J. Hsia ,
J. Economy  and
J. K. Shang
T. Du
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
M. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
S. Seghi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
K. J. Hsia
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
J. Economy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
J. K. Shang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A new experimental technique for determining mechanical properties of the polymer-metal interface was developed by replacing conventional mechanical testing machine with a piezoelectric actuator. Using this technique, fatigue crack growth behavior of epoxy/aluminum interface was studied as a function of electric field, crack length and cyclic frequency. The crack growth rate was found to depend on the magnitude of the applied electric field and decrease with testing frequency.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 661: Symposium KK – Filled & Nanocomposite Polymer Materials , 2000 , KK5.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mostovoy, S., Ripling, E. J. and Bersch, C. F., J. Adhesion, 3, 125 (1971).Google Scholar
2. Kinloch, A. J., J. Adhesion, 10, 193 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Johnson, W. S., J. Testing and Evaluation, 15, 303 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Lai, Y-H, Rakestraw, M. D. and Dillard, D. A., Int. J. Solids Struc. 33, 1725 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Zhang, Z. and Shang, J. K., Metall. Mater. Trans., 27A, 205 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Zhang, Z. and Shang, J. K., Metall. Mater. Trans, 27A, 221 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Du, T., Liu, M., Steve, S., Hsia, K. J., Economy, J. and Shang, J. K., J. Mater. Res., in press (2001).Google Scholar
8. Kinloch, A. J., Adhesion and Adhesives, Science and Technology, Chapman and Hall, London (1987).Google Scholar
9. Shang, J. K., in “Fatigue'96”, Eds., Lutjering, G. and Nowack, H., Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 43 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Hertzberg, R. W., and Manson, J. A., Fatigue of Engineering Plastics, Academic Press, NY, 1980.Google Scholar
11. Idem, Fatigue and Fracture, Encyclo of Polymer Science Engineering, 6, 2nd edn, Wiley, J., NY, 1986.Google Scholar