Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:50:59.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Method for Identification of Electron and Hole Traps in SI-GaAs by Modulated PITS and TSC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Wang Zhangao
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences 100083, P. 0. Box 912, Beijing, CHINA
Li Chengji
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences 100083, P. 0. Box 912, Beijing, CHINA
Zhang Hui
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences 100083, P. 0. Box 912, Beijing, CHINA
Li Yunyan
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences 100083, P. 0. Box 912, Beijing, CHINA
Lin Lanying
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences 100083, P. 0. Box 912, Beijing, CHINA
Get access

Abstract

The electron and hole traps in semi-insulating (SI) GaAs can not be identified by common Photoinduced Current Transient Spectroscopy (PITS) and Thermally Stimulated Current (TSC) measurements because of appearing of same sign signal for electrons and holes in both experiments. Therefore, we have developed two approaches which could be used to identify the type of the traps, and the origin of the puzzling negative peaks in the PITS spectra.

The TSC and qusi-stationary Hall effect measurements have been simultaneously performed at the temperatures between 77K and 300K. The sign of Hall voltage corresponding to TSC peak shows the type of the trap.

PITS spectra with applying different bias polarity to the sample were carefully measured with below gap and above gap photoexcitation. According to the change of PITS peak's height with different bias polarity, the electron and hole traps could be readily distinguished, since a negative bias makes hole no contribution to the PITS signal whereas electron swept into the sample would fill the electron traps, and consequently results in the appearence of the electron trap peaks. On the contrary, a positive bias would cause the filling of the hole traps.

The negative PITS peaks appearing or vanishing can be understood if one takes into account the trap initial filling conditions, the carrier recapture and the high dark current etc.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Martin, G. M., in Semi-Insulating III-V Materials, edited by Rees, G. J., (Shiva Publishing Ltd., Orpington, UK), 1980, p. 13.Google Scholar
2. Buehler, M. G., Solid State Electronics 15, 69(1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bube, R. H., Photoconductivety of Solids, (John Wiley &Sons, Inc. New York. London 1960), p. 293.Google Scholar
4. Ikuta, K., Inoue, N. and Wada, K., in Semi-Insulating III - V Materials, edited by Kukimoto, H. and Miyazawa, S., (Ohmsha Ltd. Tokoy, 1986), p. 427.Google Scholar
5. Omling, P. and Samuelson, L., in Semi-Insulating III- V Materials, edited by Malnes, A. G. and Minaner, C. J., (Shiva Publishing Ltd., Toronto, 1990), p. 17.Google Scholar