Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:53:35.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New High Performance CA Resist for E-beam Lithography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Ranee Kwong
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
Wu-Song Huang
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
Wayne Moreau
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
Robert Lang
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
Christopher Robinson
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
David R. Medeiros
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Ari Aviram
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Richard C. Guarnieri
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Marie Angelopoulos
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Get access

Abstract

Three major lithographic applications have emerged for electron beam exposure tools: optical mask fabrication, direct writing for device fabrication, and more recently projection e-beam printing. The traditional mask making process uses poly(butenesulfone) resist. A wet etch process was adopted to generate patterns on chrome. Recently, shrinking dimensions, optical proximity correction features, and the complexity of phase shift masks have forced the industry to a chrome dry etch process. ZEP, a poly(methyl α-chloroacrylate-co-α-methylstyrene) based resist, has been well accepted for most of the >180 nm device mask making. The acceptance of ZEP comes in spite of its low contrast, marginal etch resistance, organic solvent development, and concerns of resist heating associated with its high dose requirements. These issues have spawned interest in using chemically amplified resist (CAR) systems for direct write and mask making applications. We have developed a high contrast resist based on ketal protecting groups, KRS-XE, which is robust against airborne contamination and can be used for all forms of e-beam exposure in both chrome mask and silicon processing. This high contrast resist is processed with aqueous base developer and has a wide bake latitude. The development of KRS-XE has provided the capability of fabricating chrome masks for future generation (< 180 nm) devices and has potential for use with projection beam exposure systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lui, M., Coleman, T., Sauer, C., Proc. SPIE 3546, 98 (1998).Google Scholar
2.Stanton, S., Lidddle, J.. Waskiewiscz, W., and Novembre, A., J. Vac. Sci. and Tech. B16, 3197 (1998).Google Scholar
3.Kwon, K., Kang, S., Park, S., Sung, H., Kim, D., and Moon, J., J. Materials Science, Letters 18, 1197 (1999).Google Scholar
4.Nishida, T., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 4508 (1992).Google Scholar
5.Cha, B., Kim, J., Kim, B., Choi, S., Yoon, H., and Soon, J., Proc. SPIE 3546, 55 (1998).Google Scholar
6.Babin, S., Proc. SPIE 3546, 389 (1998).Google Scholar
7. (a) Wasiewicz, W., Harriott, L., Liddle, J., Stanton, S., Berger, S., Munron, E., and Zhu, X., Microelectronic Engineering 41, 215 (1998). (b) M. Sato, K. Ohmori, K. Ishikawa, T. Nakayama, A. Novembre, and L. Ocola, Proc. SPIE 3676, 227 (1999).Google Scholar
8.Pfeiffer, H., et al., J. Vac. Sci. and Tech., to be published, (1999).Google Scholar
9.Moreau, W., Semiconductor Lithography, Plenum Press, 1989, pg. 34.Google Scholar
10.Ito, H. and Willson, C., Polymer Eng and Sci. 23, 1012 (1983).Google Scholar
11.Hinsberg, W., McDonald, S., Clecak, N. and Snyder, C., Proc. SPIE 1672, 24 (1992)Google Scholar
12.Arai, M., Proc. SPIE 2512, 74 (1995).Google Scholar
13.Seeger, D., Solid State Technology, June 1997, p. 115.Google Scholar
14.Nalamasu, O., Houlihan, F., Cirelli, R., Timko, A., Watson, G., Hutton, R., Kometani, J., Reichmanis, E., Gabor, A., Medina, A., and Slater, S., J. Vac. Sci. and Tech. B16, 3716 (1998).Google Scholar
15.Tanaka, T., Morigami, M., and Atoda, N., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 12B, 6059 (1993).Google Scholar
16.Sakamizu, T., Yamaguchi, H., Shirashi, H., Murai, F., Ueno, T., J. Vac. Sci. and Tech. B11, 2812 (1993).Google Scholar
17.Ito, H. and Sherwood, M., J. Photopolymer Sci. 12, 625 (1999).Google Scholar