Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:31:40.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Data on the HyrkkÖlÄ Native Copper Mineralization: A Natural Analogue for the Long-Term Corrosion Of Copper Canisters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. Marcos ,
L. Ahonen ,
R. Bros ,
P. Roos ,
J. Suksip  and
V. Oversby
N. Marcos
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology, Engineering Geology & Geophysics Lab, P.O. Box 6200, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland
L. Ahonen
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), P.O. Box 96, FIN-02151, Espoo, Finland
R. Bros
Affiliation:
Environmental Geochemistry Laboratory, Department of Environmental Safety Research, JAERI, Tokai, Ibaraki, 319–11 Japan
P. Roos
Affiliation:
University of Lund, 22185 Lund, Sweden
J. Suksip
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Radiochemistry, P.O. Box 55 FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland
V. Oversby
Affiliation:
VMO Konsult, Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The Hyrkkölä U-Cu mineralization located in south-western Finland is reassessed with reference to the corrosion mechanisms affecting the stability of native copper and the time-scales of corrosion processes. The mineral assemblage native copper – copper sulfide occurs in open fractures at several depth intervals within granite pegmatites (GP). The surfaces of these open fractures have accumulations of uranophane crystals and other unidentified uranyl compounds. The secondary uranium minerals are mainly distributed around copper sulfide grains. Microscopic intergrowths of copper sulfides and uranyl compounds also have been observed. Groundwater samples were collected from the vicinity of the Cu samples. The hydrogeochemical features of these samples indicate that the present conditions are oxidising. The minimum age of U(VI) transport and deposition is about 200 000 years. This age is indicated by 234U/238U and 230Th/234U activity ratios of uranophane. The age of the hexavalent uranium precipitation may be somewhat later than the last influxes and/or demobilisation of sulfur.

The mineral assemblage native copper – copper oxide (cuprite) occurs only at one depth interval within altered granite pegmatite. The fracture surface was coated by smectite. The content of uranium in smectite was 69–75 ppm U. The 234U/238U and 230Th/234U activity ratios of smectite showed that it has been exposed to recent groundwaters (e.g., during the last million years). The pH of the groundwater at this interval was near neutral (6.9). The copper grains present at this fracture surface were as large as 1 mm in diameter and had rims of cuprite of 0.01 to 0.1 mm thick. The smallest grains were totally oxidised.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 825
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Marcos, I. N., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by Gray, W.J. and Triay, I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 465, Pittsburg, PA, 1996, p. 1153–1160.Google Scholar
2. Ahonen, L., Report YJT-95-19, (1995), (Helsinki, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies).Google Scholar
3. Schwartz, M.O., International Geology Review, v. 18, p. 33–44, (1996).Google Scholar
4. Amcoff, Ö., SKI Report 98:7, (1998).Google Scholar
5. Marcos, N. & Ahonen, L., POSIVA Report 98-xx (to be published).Google Scholar
6. Johanson, B. & Kojonen, K., Geol. Surv. Finland, Special Paper 10, p. 181–184, (1995).Google Scholar
7. Mäkelä, M. & Tammenmaa, J., Report of Investigation, Geol. Surv. Finland. 22p.Google Scholar
8. Yanase, N., Nightingale, T., Payne, T. & Duerden, P.. Radiochimica Acta, 52/53, p. 387–393, (1991).Google Scholar
9. Suksi, J., Ruskeeniemi, T. & Rasilainen, K., Radiochimica Acta, 58/59, p. 385–393, (1992).Google Scholar
10. Almén, K.-E., Andersson, O., Fridh, B., Johansson, B.-E., Sehlstedt, M., Gustafsson, E., Hansson, K., Olsson, O., Nilsson, G., Axelsen, K., and Wikberg, P., SKB Technical Report 86-16, 141 p. (1986).Google Scholar
11. Pósfai, M. & Busek, P.R., American Mineralogist, v. 79, p. 308–315, (1994).Google Scholar
12. The uranium in samples SM 1 and SM2 was selectively extracted by 1. NH4 acetate, 2. NH4 oxalate and the uranium in the residue for 234U/ 238U activity ratio was extracted by dissolution with HF-HNO3-HCI mixture. The uranium in sample S3 was selectively extracted by 1. Allard water, 2. NH4 acetate, 3. Tamm's reagent, and then, the uranium fraction for 234U/ 238U activity ratio was extracted by HNO3 (1M). The meaning of the sequential extraction methods for smectite is discussed in [5,16]. This discussion was not considered to be within the scope of this paper.Google Scholar
13. Lahermo, P., Ilmasti, M., Juntunen, R., and Taka, M., The Geochemical Atlas of Finland. Part 1. The hydrogeochemical mapping of Finnish Groundwater, Geol. Surv. Finland. 66 p., (1990).Google Scholar
14. Potter, R.W., Econ. Geol. 72, p. 1524–1542, (1977).Google Scholar
15. Mason, B., Principles of Geochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, (1966).Google Scholar
16. Bros, R., SKB Utveckling Project Report U-98-13, (1998).Google Scholar