Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:35:51.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new approach to atomic level characterization of grain boundaries by atom probe tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

L. Yao  and
M. K. Miller
L. Yao
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6139, U.S.A.
M. K. Miller
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6139, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

A novel atom probe tomography (APT) method has been developed that enables a full description of the orientation relationship between individual grains to be determined together with estimates of the extents of solute segregation for all elements over the surface of the grain boundary with 1 nm by 1 nm spatial resolution. This approach also enables variations in the solute excess for the elements with the habit plane and curvature of the grain boundary to be evaluated. The method has been applied to a mechanically-alloyed nanostructured ferritic alloy (NFA) after high dose heavy ion irradiation. The innovative high-resolution two-dimensional mapping of the solute segregation across the surface of grain boundaries in the NFA clearly demonstrates that the distributions of chromium and tungsten are not uniform across the grain boundaries, and the distributions correlate with changes in its local curvature and the position of the grain boundary precipitates. These features pin the grain boundary against grain growth and provide the stability for excellent creep properties.

Keywords

grain boundariesion-implantationnanostructure
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1645: Symposium EE/ZZ – Advanced Materials in Extreme Environments , 2014 , mrsf13-1645-ee07-09
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Klueh, R. L., Shingledecker, J. P., Swindeman, R. W. and Hoelzer, D. T., J. Nucl. Mater. 341, 103 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. K. and Parish, C. M., Mater. Sci. Technol. 27, 729 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, L., Moody, M. P., Cairney, J. M., Haley, D., Ceguerra, A. V., Zhu, C., and Ringer, S. P., Ultramicroscopy 111, 458 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, L., Ringer, S. P., Cairney, J. M. and Miller, M. K., Scripta Mater., 69, 622 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. K. and Yao, L., Curr. Opin. Solid St. M. 17, 203 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. K., Russell, K. F., Thompson, K., Alvis, R., and Larson, D. J., Microsc. Microanal. 13, 428 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, L., Cairney, J. M., Zhu, C. and Ringer, S. P., Ultramicroscopy 111, 648 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. K. and Smith, G. D. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 19, 57 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J., In The Collected Works of J. Willard Gibbs, (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1948) pp. 219–252.Google Scholar
D’Errico, J., (2006), Surface Fitting using gridfit, http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/8998-surface-fitting-using-gridfit.Google Scholar