Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:04:16.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neutron Scattering to Characterize Cu/Mg(Li) Destabilized Hydrogen Storage Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Maria Helena Braga
Affiliation:
[email protected], LANL, LANSCE, Los Alamos, United States
Michael Joseph Wolverton
Affiliation:
[email protected], LANL, LANSCE, Los Alamos, United States
Anna Lobet-Megias
Affiliation:
[email protected], LANL, LANSCE, Los Alamos, United States
Luc L. Daemen
Affiliation:
[email protected], LANL, LANSCE, Los Alamos, United States
Get access

Abstract

Cu-Li-Mg-(H,D) was studied as an example of destabilizer of the Ti-(H,D) system. A Cu-Li-Mg alloy was prepared resulting in the formation of a system with 60.5 at% of CuLi0.08Mg1.92, 23.9 at% of CuMg2 and 15.6 at% of Cu2Mg. Titanium was added to a fraction of this mixture so that 68.2 at% (47.3 wt%) of the final mixture was Ti. The mixture was ground and kept at 200 °C/473 K for 7h under H2 or 9h under D2 at P = 34 bar. Under those conditions, neutron powder diffraction shows the formation of TiD2, as well as of the deuteride of CuLi0.08Mg1.92. Similarly inelastic neutron scattering shows that at 10 K TiH2 is present in the sample, together with the hydride of CuLi0.08Mg1.92. Interestingly, at 10 K TiH2 is very clearly detected and at 300 K TiH2 is still clearly present as indicated by the neutron vibrational spectrum, but CuLi0.08Mg1.92-H is not detected anymore. These results indicate that Ti(H,D)2 is possibly formed by diffusion of hydrogen from the Cu-Li-Mg-(H,D) alloys. This is an intriguing result since TiH2 is normally synthesized from the metal at T > 400°C/673 K (and most commonly at T ˜ 700 °C/973 K). In the presence of CuLi0.08Mg1.92, TiH2 forms at a temperature that is 300 – 400 K lower than that needed to synthesize it just from the elements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reilly, J.J. Wiswall, R.H. Inorg. Chem., 6(12) (1967) 22202223.Google Scholar
2Match, http://www.crystalimpact.com/, 2009.Google Scholar
3.Wolff, P.M. de, Visser, J.W. Absolute Intensities. Report 641.109. Technisch Physische Dienst, Delft, Netherlands. Reprinted (1988) Powder Diffract 3:202204.Google Scholar
4 Larson, A.C. Dreele, R.B. von, GSAS Generalized Structure Analysis System, LANSCE, Los Alamos, 2004.Google Scholar
5 Braga, M.H. Ferreira, J.J.A. Siewenie, J. Proffen, T. Vogel, S.C. Daemen, L.L. J. of Sol. Stat. Chem., 183(1) (2010) 1019.Google Scholar
6 Braga, M.H. Wolverton, M. Hartl, M. Xu, H. Zhao, Y. Daemen, L.L. RGSAM – Rio Grande Symposium on Advanced Materials, Albuquerque, NM, USA, October 5th, 2009, P 14, p. 27.Google Scholar
7 Yakel, H.L.jr. Acta Crystall. 11 (1958) 4651.Google Scholar
8 Irving, P.E. Beevers, C.A. Metall. Trans. 2 (1971) 613615.Google Scholar