Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:29:01.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanotubes and nanoparticles based 3D scaffolds for the construction of high performance Biosensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2014

Meenakshi Singh
Affiliation:
Université Joseph Fourier, Département de Chimie Moléculaire UMR-5250, ICMG FR-2607, CNRS, Grenoble, France.
Michael Holzinger
Affiliation:
Université Joseph Fourier, Département de Chimie Moléculaire UMR-5250, ICMG FR-2607, CNRS, Grenoble, France.
Maryam Tabrizian
Affiliation:
McGill University, Biomat'X Research Laboratories, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering and Faculty of Dentistry, Montréal, Canada.
Serge Cosnier
Affiliation:
Université Joseph Fourier, Département de Chimie Moléculaire UMR-5250, ICMG FR-2607, CNRS, Grenoble, France.
Get access

Abstract

3D scaffolds with different pore sizes, using single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and nanoparticles of different size were constructed. Biotinylated glucose oxidase (GOX-B) and anti-cholera toxin (anti-CT) were immobilized onto the one and two level nanoscaffolds, functionalized with pyrene-β-cyclodextrin for the construction of glucose based enzyme sensors and immunosensors, respectively. For enzyme sensors, highest current density and sensitivity (41.72 μA cm-2, 3 mA M-1 cm-2) were obtained with two level scaffolds made with 100 nm nanoparticles. In contrast to this, for immunosensors, highest current density and sensitivity (11.71 μA cm-2, 116.2 μA M-1 cm-2) were obtained with two level scaffolds made with 500 nm nanoparticles, indicating that the pore sizes can be adjusted using different size of nanoparticles for the respective applications.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chen, R. J., Choi, H. C., Bangsaruntip, S., Yenilmez, E., Tang, X., Wang, Q., Chang, Y.-L., Dai, H., Journal of the American Chemical Society. 126, 15631568 (2004).10.1021/ja038702mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-González, M., González-García, M. B., Costa-García, A., Electroanalysis. 17, 19011918 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E., Willner, I., Electroanalysis. 15, 913947 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddad, R., Cosnier, S., Maaref, A., Holzinger, M., Sensor Lett. 7, 801805 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzinger, M., Singh, M., and Cosnier, S., Langmuir. 28(34), pp 1256912574 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar