Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:44:32.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanotesla Detection Using the Planar Hall Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Schuhl
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Central de Recherches, Thomson-CSF, 91404 Orsay, France
F. Nguyen Van Dau
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Central de Recherches, Thomson-CSF, 91404 Orsay, France
J.R. Childress
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mat. Science and Engineering U. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2066.
Get access

Abstract

A magnetic field sensor based on the planar Hall effect has been developed using epitaxial permalloy (Ni80Fe20) ultrathin films (1-10 nm). The magnetic and magnetotransport properties of these films have been studied in detail. For thicknesses above 5 nm, the resistivity of the permalloy film is below 5μΩ-cm, and its magnetoresistance ratio is 2%. By using the transverse resistivity for detection, we have reduced thermal drift effects by five orders of magnitude. We also make use of a weak uniaxial anisotropy induced in the permalloy through exchange coupling with a 6 nm-thick Fe/Pd multilayer, itself grown directly on the MgO substrate. Magnetic sensors based on these films have been used successfully to detect fields below 10 nT at 1Hz. Since the lateral dimensions of the sensing element are small (<30μm), and because of the ferromagnetic coupling with the Fe/Pd structure, it consists of a single magnetic domain. Sensitivities above 100 V/T-A have been obtained, with deviations from linearity of less than 2% over 4 decades.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Roumenin, C. S.Solid State Magnetic Sensors”, Elsevier Publication, Amsterdam 1994.Google Scholar
2. McGuire, T.R. and Plotter, R.I., IEEE trans. Mag. MAG-11, 1018 (1975)Google Scholar
3. Schuhl, A. Galtier, P., Durand, O. Childress, J.R. and Kergoat, R., Appl. Phys Lett. 65, 913 (1994)Google Scholar
4. Childress, J. R. Kergoat, R. George, J.-M., Durand, O. Galtier, P. Miltat, J. and Schuhl, A., J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 129, (1994).Google Scholar
5. Durand, O. Childress, J.R. Galtier, P. Bisaro, R. and Schuhl, A. J. Mag. Mat. and Mag. 145, 111 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Ciureanu, P., “Magnetoresistive Sensors” in Thin-Film Resistive Sensors page 276, IOP Ltd London (1992).Google Scholar
7. Dau, F. Nguyen Van Childress, J. R. and Schuhl, A., to be published in the Proceeding of the European conference and sensors and actuators “EUROSENSORS”, Stockholm Sweden, (1995).Google Scholar