Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:12:55.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanostructured Ultrathin Films of Silicate Clay and Polyelectrolytes: Deposition Parameters and Mechanical Properties by Nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Xiaowu Fan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham 901 14th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, U.S.A.
Rigoberto C. Advincula
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham 901 14th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Recently, we have investigated the electrostatic layer-by-layer (ELBL) deposition of polycation and clay platelet ultrathin films. We have investigated the properties of these films using techniques such as ellipsometry, X-ray diffraction and atomic force microscopy (AFM). In this work, we report our results regarding the formation of this type of hybrid ultrathin films focusing on their mechanical properties as probed by nanoindentation experiments. Structural information such as film thickness, platelet coverage, surface morphology, roughness, etc., is important parameters for their potential use as coatings. We have investigated the relationship of several of these parameters with their mechanical hardness and modulus properties as a function of indentor probe depth in nanoindentation experiments. The ultrathin films have remarkable mechanical properties very different from most polymer ultrathin films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Kleinfeld, E.R., Ferguson, G.S., Science 265, 265, 370 (1994).Google Scholar
[2] Giannelis, E.P., Krishnamoorti, R., Manias, E., Advances in Polym. Sci. 38, 38 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Fendler, J. H. Chem. Mater. 8, 1616 (1996).Google Scholar
[4] Kotov, N.A., Haraszti, T., Turi, L., Zavala, G., Geer, R., Dekany, I., Fendler, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 6821 (1997).Google Scholar
[5] Kim, D. W., Blumstein, A., Kuma, J., Tripathy, K.S., Chem. Mater. Comun. 13, 565 (2001).Google Scholar
[6] Oliver, W.C., Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992)Google Scholar
[7] Li, J., Thostenson, E.T., Chou, T.W., Riester, L.J., Eng. Mater. Technol. 120, 154 (1998).Google Scholar
[8] Mann, A.B., Pethia, J.B. Langmuir 12, 4583 (1996).Google Scholar
[9] Poilane, C., Delobelle, P., Lexcellent, C., Hayashi, S., Tobushi, H. Thin Solid Films, 379, 156 (2000).Google Scholar
[10] Karapanagotis, I., Gerberich, W., Evans, D., Langmuir 17, 2375 (2001).Google Scholar
[11] Wang, J., Shi, F.G., Nieh, T.G., Zhao, B., Brongo, M.R., Qu, S., Rosenmayer, T., Scripta Mater. 42, 687 (2000)Google Scholar
[12] Du, B., Tsui, O., Zhang, Q., He, T., Langmuir 17, 3286 (2001).Google Scholar