Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T19:07:20.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nano-patterned Growth of Ge Quantum Dots for Infrared Detector Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Christopher Chen
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Los Angeles, Electrical Engineering, c/o K.L. Wang, 66-147B Eng IV 420 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, United States
Dongho Cha
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Los Angeles, Electrical Engineering, United States
Joo-young Lee
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Los Angeles, Electrical Engineering, United States
Hyung-jun Kim
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Los Angeles, Electrical Engineering
Fei Liu
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Los Angeles, Electrical Engineering, United States
Song Tong
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Los Angeles, Electrical Engineering
Kang L. Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Los Angeles, Electrical Engineering, United States
Jia-Yu Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Polymer Science and Engineering, United States
Thomas P. Russell
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Polymer Science and Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

Quantum dot infrared photodetectors (QDIPs) have been studied widely for normal-incidence infrared detection. The 3D confinement provided by quantum dots allows for the elimination of gratings that are typically required for normal-incidence detection in quantum well infrared photodetectors (QWIPs). Furthermore, the growth of Ge dots on Si substrates offers the potential for integration with existing CMOS platforms. To date, however, Ge QDIPs have typically been grown epitaxially by Stranski-Krastonov growth – producing pancake-like dots with base dimensions of 50-100 nm, heights of 7-10 nm, and an aerial dot density of 109–1010 cm−2. Such dots have poor lateral confinement, causing them to have non-ideal normal-incidence absorption characteristics, similar to quantum wells. In this work, we demonstrate infrared absorption in Ge dots with base dimensions of approximately 15 nm. These dots are epitaxially grown on pre-patterned Si substrates, with an aerial dot density of approximately 1011 cm−2. The substrates are prepared by using diblock copolymers to create a nano-pattern on the substrate surface which is transferred to the substrate by dry etching. The size of this pattern determines the base dimensions of the Ge dots. After growth, these dots are then tested for their infrared absorption properties using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. The normal-incidence absorption of the dots can be studied with FTIR by varying the polarization angle of the infrared light. We present FTIR absorption spectra for samples grown with various conditions (e.g., different dot doping levels, numbers of layers, and dot base dimensions) and investigate the effects of different growth conditions on infrared absorption properties. We also report on the normal-incidence absorption characteristics of these dots by presenting absorption spectra for various polarization angles of infrared light.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Gunapala, S.D., Liu, J.K., Park, J.S., Sundaram, M., Shott, C.A., Hoelter, T., Lin, T.-L., Massie, S.T., Maker, P.D., Muller, R.E., Sarusi, G., IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, 44, 51 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Tong, S., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, H.-J., Liu, F., Wang, K.L., Optical Materials, 27 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Lin, Y.-Y. and Singh, J., J. Appl. Phys., 96, 1059 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Liu, F., Tong, S., Liu, J.L., Wang, K.L., J. Electron. Mater., 33, 846 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Karunasiri, R.P.G., Wang, K.L., Park, J.S., in Semiconductor Interfaces and Microstructures, edited by Feng, Z.C., (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), pp. 252279.Google Scholar
6. Karunasiri, R.P.G., in Quantum Well Intersubband Transition Physics and Devices, edited by Liu, H.C., Levine, B.F., and Andersson, J.Y., (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 1994) pp. 237250.Google Scholar