Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:23:04.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanolayer Ordering in an Epoxy-Exfoliated Clay Hybrid Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Tie Lan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Fundamental Materials Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Thomas J. Pinnavaia
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Fundamental Materials Research, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access

Abstract

A new class of epoxy-clay nanocomposites have been prepared from alkylammonium exchanged fluorohectorite clays. These nanocomposites have usually large and regular basal spacings up to 105 Å platelet separation. The extra large separation of the clay nanolayers results in reinforcement of the polymer matrix, the reinforcing effect being comparable to that of disordered phased nanocomposites. It is now possible to define two general classes of exfoliated clay nanocomposites, namely those with long range nanolayer ordering, and those with little or no long range ordering. Long range ordering is indicated by the XRD patterns that have multiple 001 harmonies whereas disordered composites exhibit little or no 001diffraction. Regardless of the presence of X-ray Bragg diffraction, exfoliated polymer-clay nanocomposites form when adjacent clay nanolayers are separated by a distance that precludes the possibility of interlayer communication through the association of galleries cations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Whitesides, G.M., Mathias, T.P., Seto, C.T., Science, 254, 1312 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Philipp, G., Schimdt, H., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 80, 283, (1984).Google Scholar
3. Novak, B., Adv. Mater., 5,422 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Pinnavaia, T.J., Science, 220, 365 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Langley, N.R., Mbah, G.C., Freeman, H.A., Huang, H., Siochi, E.J., Ward, T.C., Wilkes, G., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 143, 309 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Wang, S., Ahmad, Z., Mark, J.E., Preceedings of ACS, Div. of Polymeric Materials:Science and Engineering (PMSE), 70, 305 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Giannelis, E.P., JOM, 44, 28 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Gleiter, H., Adv. Mater., 4, 474 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Pinnavaia, T.J., Lan, T., Kaviratna, P.D., Wang, M., “Clay-Polymer Nanocomposites:Polyether and Polyimide Systems”. MRS Symposium Proceeding, 348, 88 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Kojima, Y., Usuki, A., Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Fukushima, Y., Kurauchi, T., Kamigaito, O., J. Mater. Res., 8, 1185 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Lan, T., Kaviratna, P.D., Pinnavaia, T.J., Proceedings of ACS, Div. of Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering (PMSE), 71, 528 (1994).Google Scholar
12. Messersmith, P.B., Giannelis, E.P., Chem. Mater., 5, 1064 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Lan, T., Kaviratna, P.D., Pinnavaia, T.J., Chem. Mater., 7, 2144, (1995).Google Scholar
14. Lan, T., Pinnavaia, T.J., Chem. Mater., 6, 2216 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Lagaly, G., Beneke, K., Weiss, A., American Mineralogist, 60, 642 (1975).Google Scholar