Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:31:01.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanoindentation of Bone in a Physiological Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

R. Akhtar ,
S. Morse  and
P. M. Mummery
R. Akhtar
Affiliation:
School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7HS, United Kingdom
S. Morse
Affiliation:
School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7HS, United Kingdom
P. M. Mummery
Affiliation:
School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7HS, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation has been established as an effective method to measure the mechanical properties of bone tissue at the micron and sub-micron length scale. Although it is well-documented that the mechanical properties of macroscopic bone specimens vary depending on whether the samples are tested dry or wet, nanoindentation is generally conducted on dehydrated bone tissue at room temperature, primarily because nanoindentation systems are extremely sensitive to changes in environmental conditions such as humidity and temperature. In this study, these problems were overcome by using a specially constructed liquid cell with an extension piece that allowed the indenter tip to be submerged under 5 mm of liquid. The custom setup was used to test cortical bovine bone and cancellous human bone specimens in three distinct conditions – dehydrated, rehydrated in simulated body fluid (SBF) at 20°C, and rehydrated in SBF at 37.5°C. A heating element with a temperature control unit was used to test at 37.5°C. The hardness and elastic modulus of the bone samples were found to decrease when dry specimens were rehydrated and tested in physiological conditions. It is suggested that nanoindentation in physiological conditions gives a better estimate of the mechanical properties of the microstructural components of bone in vivo rather than nanoindentation under conventional conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 841: Symposium R – Fundamentals of Nanoindentation and Nanotribology III , 2004 , R2.9/Y2.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rho, J-Y., Tsui, T.Y. and Pharr, G.M, Biomaterials 18, 1325 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Rho, J-Y., Roy, M.E., Tsui, T.Y. and Pharr, G.M., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 45, 48 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Choi, K., Kuhn, J.L., Ciarelli, M.J. and Goldstein, S.A., J. Biomech. 23, 1103 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Currey, J.D., J. Biomech. 21, 439 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Weiner, S. and Wagner, H.D., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 271 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Bushby, A.J., Ferguson, V.L. and Boyde, A., J. Mat. Res. 19, 249 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Rho, J-Y. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Sci.: Mat. Med. 10, 485 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Hengsberger, S., Kulik, A. and Zysset, Ph., Bone 30, 178 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Stoch, S.A., Parker, R.A., Chen, L. et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 2787 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Kokubo, T., Kushitani, H., Sakka, S., Kitsugi, T. and Yamamuro, T., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24, 721 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Beake, B.D. and Smith, J.F., Phil. Mag. A. 82, 2179 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Currey, J.D., Brear, K., Zioupos, P. and Reilly, G.C., Biomaterials 16, 1267 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Leikina, E., Mertts, M.V., Kuznetsova, N. and Leikin, S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99, 1314 (2002).Google Scholar
14. Huang, J-S. and Gibson, L.J., Mater. Sci. Engng. A 339, 220 (2003).Google Scholar