Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T14:40:58.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiphoton Excitation Techniques in Combustion Diagnostics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. E. M. Goldsmith
J. E. M. Goldsmith*
Affiliation:
Combustion Research Facility, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

Multiphoton excitation provides spectroscopic access to several species that are very important in flame studies, but that cannot be detected in combustion environments using conventional optical techniques. This paper describes applications of multiphoton excitation techniques for detecting such species in combustion environments, with an emphasis placed on measurements of atomic hydrogen in flames.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 117: Symposium C – Process Diagnostics: Materials, Combustion, Fusion , 1988 , 193
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Goldsmith, J. E. M., “Flame studies of atomic hydrogen and oxygen using resonant multiphoton optogalvanic spectroscopy,” in Twentieth Symposium (International) on Combustion, (The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1984), pp. 1331–1337.Google Scholar
2. Goldsmith, J. E. M., “Resonant Multiphoton Optogalvanic Detection of Atomic Hydrogen in Flames,” Opt. Lett. 7, 437 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Tjossem, P. J. H. and Cool, T. A., “Detection of atomic hydrogen in flames by resonance four-photon ionization,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 100, 479 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Lucht, R. P., Salmon, J. T., King, G. B., Sweeney, D. W., and Laurendeau, N. M., “Twophoton- excited fluorescence measurement of hydrogen atoms in flames,” Opt. Lett. 8, 365 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Aldén, M., Schawlow, A. L., Svanberg, S., Wendt, W., and Zhang, P.-L., “Three-photonexcited fluorescence detection of atomic hydrogen in an atmospheric-pressure flame,” Opt. Lett. 9, 211 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Goldsmith, J. E. M., “Two-Step Saturated Fluorescence Detection of Atomic Hydrogen in Flames,” Opt. Lett. 10, 116 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Aldén, M., Edner, H., Grafström, P., and Svanberg, S., “Two-photon excitation of atomic oxygen in a flame,” Opt. Commun. 42, 244 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Goldsmith, J. E. M., “Resonant multiphoton optogalvanic detection of atomic oxygen in flames,” J. Chem. Phys. 78, 1610 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Aldén, M., Wallin, S., and Wendt, W., “Applications of two-photon absorption for detection of CO in combustion gases,” Appl. Phys. B 33, 205 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Smyth, K. C. and Taylor, P. H., “Detection of the methyl radical in a methane/air diffusion flame by multiphoton ionization spectroscopy,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 122, 518 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hanson, R. K., “Combustion diagnostics: planar imaging techniques,” in Twenty-First Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute (in press).Google Scholar
12. Aldén, M., Hertz, H. M., Svanberg, S., and Wallin, S., “Imaging laser-induced fluorescence of oxygen atoms in a flame,” Appl. Opt. 23, 3255 (1984).Google Scholar
13. Goldsmith, J. E. M. and Anderson, R. J. M., “Imaging of Atomic Hydrogen in Flames with Two-Step Saturated Fluorescence Detection,” Appl. Opt. 24, 607 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Haumann, J., Seitzman, J. M., and Hanson, R. K., “Two-photon digital imaging of CO in combustion flows using planar laser-induced fluorescence,” Opt. Lett. 11, 776 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Goldsmith, J. E. M., “Photochemical effects in 205-nm, two-photon-excited fluorescence detection of atomic hydrogen in flames,” Opt. Lett. 11, 416 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Goldsmith, J. E. M., “Photochemical Effects in Two-Photon-Excited Fluorescence Detection of Atomic Oxygen in Flames,” Appl. Opt. 26, 3566 (1987).Google Scholar
17. Meijer, G., Meulen, J. J. ter, Andresen, P., and Bath, A., “Sensitive quantum state selective detection of H2O and D2O by (2+1)-resonance enhanced multiphoton ionization,” J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6914 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Goldsmith, J. E. M., “Multiphoton-Excited Fluorescence Measurements of Atomic Hydrogen in Low-Pressure Flames” (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
19. Garland, N. L. and Crosley, D. R., “On the collisional quenching of electronically excited OH, NH, and CH in flames,” in Twenty-First Symposium (International)o n Combustion, The Combustion Institute (in press).Google Scholar
20. Meier, U., Kohse-Höinghaus, K., and Just, Th., “H and O atom detection for combustion applications: study of quenching and laser photolysis effects,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 126, 567 (1986).Google Scholar
21. Bittner, J, Kohse-Höinghaus, K., Meier, U., Kelm, S., and Just, Th., “Determination of absolute H atom concentrations in low-pressure flames by two-photon laser-excited fluorescence,” Combust. Flame 71, 41 (1988).Google Scholar
22. Lewis, B. R., Carver, J. H., Hobbs, T. I., McCoy, D. G., and Gies, H. P. F., “Rotational variation of predissociation linewidths for the Schumann-Runge bands of molecular oxygen,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 22, 213 (1979), and references therein.Google Scholar
23. Salmon, J. T. and Laurendeau, N. M., “Quenching-independent fluorescence measurements of atomic hydrogen with photoionization controlled-loss spectroscopy,” Opt. Lett. 11, 419 (1986).Google Scholar