Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:30:25.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mössbauer study of 50MeV Li3+ ion irradiated Mg0.9Mn 0.1InxFe2-xO4 ferrite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

M. Singh ,
Anjana Dogra  and
Ravi Kumar
M. Singh
Affiliation:
H.P. University, Summer Hill, Shimla-171005, India.
Anjana Dogra
Affiliation:
H.P. University, Summer Hill, Shimla-171005, India. Nuclear Science Center, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi -110067, India.
Ravi Kumar
Affiliation:
Nuclear Science Center, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi -110067, India.
Get access

Abstract

A series of samples of Mg0.9Mn0.1InxFe2-xO4 for x=0, 0.3, 0.5 were prepared by conventional solid-state technique. The spinel structure of this ferrite was confirmed by X-ray diffraction technique. The samples were irradiated with 50 MeV Li3+ ions with fluence 5×1013 ions/cm2. The Mössbauer studies were performed on unirradiated as well as on irradiated samples. Mössbauer study for unirradiated samples show insignificant variation of isomer shifts at both the tetrahedral and octahedral sites. On irradiation isomer shift changes from negative to positive values. This anomalous character of isomer shift after irradiation is due to a change in the electronic configuration of Fe3+ ions. The quadrupole splitting of unirradiated samples are negligibly small, indicates the presence of cubic symmetry at both the sites. On irradiation appreciable changes are observed in quadrupole splitting due to the presence of lattice strain. On irradiation super-exchange interaction energy is weakened which decrease the hyperfine field. PACS: 61.80, 76.80, 61.72

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 792: Symposium R – Radiation Effects and Ion Beam Processing of Materials , 2003 , R3.14
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Toulemonde., M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B, 156 (1999) 1–11.Google Scholar
2. Szenes., G., Phys. Rev, 51 (1995) 8026–8029.Google Scholar
3. Barbu, A., Dammak, H., Dunlop, A. and Lesues., D., MRS Bulletin (1995) 29–34.Google Scholar
4. Studer, F. and Toulemonde., M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B, 65 (1992) 560.Google Scholar
5. Studer, F. and Pascard., H., Journal De Physique IV France 7 (1997) C1–211.Google Scholar
6. Von Meerwal, E., Computer Physics Communications, 9 (1975) 117.Google Scholar
7. Singh, M., Dogra, Anjana, Kumar, Ravi Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 196 (2002) 315.Google Scholar
8. Pascard, H., Phys. Rev., 30 (1984) 2299.Google Scholar
9. Belov, V.F., Khimich, T.A., Alekseyuk, L.A., Korovushkin, V.V, Korneev, E.V., Sharenevich, L.N., Shipko, M.N. and Podvalnykh, G.S. Sov Powder Metal & Met Ceramic 10 (1971) 467.Google Scholar
10. Wang, L., Li, F.S. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 223 (2001) 233.Google Scholar
11. Watson, R.E. and Freeman, A.I., Phys. Rev., 123 (1961) 2027.Google Scholar
12. Marshall, W., Phys. Rev. 110 (1959) 1280.Google Scholar
13. Puri, R.K., Singh, M., Sud, S.P. Journal of Material Science 29 (1994) 2182.Google Scholar