Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T06:43:01.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monte Carlo Modeling of Interphase Boundaries in Cu-Ag and Cu-Ag-Au Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

P. Bacher  and
P. Wynblatt
P. Bacher
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials ScienceCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
P. Wynblatt
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials ScienceCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Get access

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulation, in conjunction with the embedded atom method, has been used to model the composition and structure of a semicoherent (001) interphase boundary separating coexisting Cu-rich and Ag-rich phases in a binary Cu-Ag alloy. The results are compared with earlier simulations of the same boundary in a Cu-Ag-Au alloy, in which Au was found to segregate to the interface, and the boundary was found to be unstable with respect to break-up into {111} facets. The boundary in the binary system is also unstable to faceting, but displays both {100} as well as {111} facets. It is concluded that Au segregation in the ternary alloy plays an important role in stabilizing the {111} facets. The interplay between the misfit dislocations present at the interface, and the compositional features of the boundary are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 205: Symposium F – Kinetics of Phase Transformations , 1990 , 375
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bacher, P., Wynblatt, P. and Foiles, S. M., Acta Metall. Mater., to be published.Google Scholar
2. Rogers, J. P., Wynblaft, P., Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I., Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 177 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Daw, M. S., Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. Lett., 50, 1285 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Daw, M. S., Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev., B29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I., Daw, M. S., Phys. Rev. B53, 7983 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dregia, S. A., Bauer, C. L., Wynblatt, P., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 56, (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA 1986) p. 189.Google Scholar
7. Dregia, S. A., Wynblatt, P., Bauer, C. L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A5, 1746 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Binder, K. (editor), Application of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, (Springer, New York 1984).Google Scholar
9. Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. B32, 7685 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Dregia, S. A., Wynblatt, P., Bauer, C. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 141, (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA 1989) p. 399.Google Scholar
11. P. Wynblatt and Dregia, S. A., in Intergranular and Interphase Boundaries in Materials, Supplement to J. Physique, 51, C1–757 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Kamat, S. V., Hirth, J. P. and Carnahan, B., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 103, (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA 1988), p. 55.Google Scholar