Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:33:52.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular dynamics simulations of the two-way shape-memory effect in NiTi nanowires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2015

Prashanth Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands
Lucia Nicola
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands
Barend Thijsse
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands
Angelo Simone
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) exist in different phases depending on temperature and stress level. Experimental evidence shows that SMAs oscillate between two shapes during thermal cycling. This phenomenon, known as two-way shape-memory effect, occurs due to a transformation between the austenitic phase and the martensitic phase. The two-way shape-memory behavior is studied here by molecular dynamics simulations in NiTi nanowires of different diameter to understand the effect of loading on the size-dependent behavior. Thermal cycling is performed while holding the system at zero stress and at a fixed compressive stress. At zero stress, the martensite structure formed on cooling depends on the wire diameter. However, when cooling is performed at a sufficiently large constant compressive stress, the formation of a single martensitic variant is observed for all diameters.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jani, J. M., Leary, M., Subic, A., and Gibson, M. A.. Materials and Design, 56:10781113, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, K. and Liu, Y.. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 400:163170, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Rogers, C., and Liang, C.. Philosophical Magazine A, 8:353362, 1997.Google Scholar
Jones, N. and Dye, D.. Intermetallics, 19:13481358, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirzaeifar, R., Gall, K., Zhu, T., Yavari, A., and DesRoches, R.. Journal of Applied Physics, 115(194307), 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Y. and Zhu, T.. Scripta Materialia, 67:883886, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potapov, P., Shelyakov, A., and Schryvers, D.. Scripta Materialia, 44:17, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saburi, T., Watanabe, Y., and Nenno, S.. ISIJ International, 29:405411, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waitz, T., Kazykhanov, V., and Karnthaler, H.. Acta Materialia, 52:137147, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, M. and Sinclair, J.. Philosophical Magazine A, 50:4555, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, W. and Liu, B.. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 12(L53), 2000.Google Scholar
Mutter, D. and Nielaba, P.. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 577:S83S87, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Y., Gall, K., and Zhu, T.. Journal of Applied Physics, 110(033532), 2011.Google Scholar
Mutter, D. and Nielaba, P.. Physical Review B, 82(224201), 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Y., Gall, K., and Zhu, T.. Acta Materialia, 60:6301–11, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimpton, S. J.. Journal of Computer Physics, 117:119, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swope, W., Anderson, H., Berens, P., and Wilson, K.. Journal of Chemical Physics, 76: 637649, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar