Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:19:16.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Low-Energy Atom-Surface Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J. A. Sprague
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 4672, Washington, DC 20375-5000
C. M. Gilmore
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 4672, Washington, DC 20375-5000
Get access

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations of the deposition of atoms on crystalline surfaces have been conducted using the embedded atom method. The following atom-substrate combinations have been employed: 0.1 - 40 eV Ag deposited on (111) and (100) Ag substrates; 0.1 eV Ag deposited on (100) Cu; and 0.1 eV Cu deposited on (100) Ag. The purpose of the calculations for Ag atoms deposited on Ag substrates was to investigate the effects of adatom arrival energy and substrate orientation on the interactions of low-energy atoms with crystal surfaces. The goal of tile Ag oil Cu and Cu on Ag calculations was to observe the mechanisms producing thepreviously-reported asymmetry in epitaxy for these systems. The Ag on Ag deposition simulations demonstrated that the effects of increased atom arrival energies in promoting layerby- layer film growth and producing diffuse substrate-filn interfaces (mixing) were basically the same on the (100) and (111) surfaces. At 0. 1 eV, representative of thennal evaporation, the degree of island formation on the (100) substrate was essentially tile same as previously reported for a (111) Ag substrate. At a given atom arrival energy between 10 and 40 eV, both the redistribution into full monolayers and the mixing by surface exchange interactions were seen to occur more readily on the close-packed (111) growth surface than on the more open (100) surface. The mixing was a stronger function of crystallographic orientation. Cu was observed to grow on (100) Ag as a (100)-oriented film, with the initial film layers transfonned essentially to the bcc structure by a Bain distortion, in agreement with various experimental results. The distortion of the film layers resulted in large-amplitude soft-mode (low-frequency) lattice vibrations. Ag was observed to grow on (100) Cu as a (111)-oriented film, as experimentally observed, with the <110>-type orientations of film and substrate parallel, as predicted by previous calculations of interfacial energy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yu, L. S., Harper, J. M. E., Cuomo, J. J., and Smith, D. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4, 443 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Green, J. E. and Barnett, S. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 21, 235 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Bland, R. D., Kominiak, G. J., and Mattox, D. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11, 671 (1974).Google Scholar
4. Schwebel, C., Meyer, F., Gautherin, G., and Pellet, C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B4, 1153 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Namba, Y. and Mori, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 13, 693 (1976).Google Scholar
6. Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. B29, 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gilmore, C. M. and Sprague, J. A., Phys. Rev. B44, 8950 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Gilmore, C. M. and Sprague, J. A., Surface and Coatings Technology 51, 324 (1992)Google Scholar
9. Chang, C.-A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A9, 98 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Egelhoff, W. F. Jr, Jacob, I., Rudd, J. M., Cochran, J. F., and Heinrich, B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 1582 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Reed-Hill, R. E. and Abbaschian, R., Physical Metallurgy Principles, Third Edition. Boston, PWS-Kent Publ. Co. (1992).Google Scholar
12. Gao, Y., Shewmnon, P. G., and Dregia, S. A., Acta Metall. 32, 3165 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I., and Daw, M. S., Phys. Rev. B–33, 7983 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Haftel, M., Andreadis, T. D., Lill, J. V., and Eridon, J. M., Phys. Rev. B42, 11540 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Rilling, W. K., Gilmore, C. M., Andreadis, T. D., and Sprague, J. A., Can. J. Phys. 68, 1035 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Voter, A. F., Opt. Eng. 821, 214 (1987).Google Scholar
17. Mueller, K., Phys. Rev. B35, 7906 (1987).Google Scholar
18. Mueller, K., Surf. Sci. 184, L375, (1987).Google Scholar
19. Andreadis, T. D., Rosen, M., Haftel, N. I., and Sprague, J. A., Evolution of Thin-Filmn and Surface Microstructure, Thompson, C. V., Tsao, J. Y., and Srolovitz, D. J., eds., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. Vol. 202, 283 (1991).Google Scholar
20. Evans, J. W., Phys. Rev. B43, 3897 (1991).Google Scholar