Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:45:19.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Grain-Boundary Diffusion for Varying TILT Angle Geometries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Steven J. Plimpton
Steven J. Plimpton*
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The effect of structure and geometry on grain boundary self-diffusion is investigated. Using static structures found by relaxation techniques (conjugate gradients) as starting points for a molecular dynamic simulation of a bicrystal model, diffusion coefficients and activation energies are calculated for (100) fcc Al and bcc α-Fe tilt boundaries. These quantities are derived by monitoring the mean-squared displacement of atoms in the grain boundary region as the simulation progresses and as the temperature of the simulated solid is changed. The angular, directional, and structural dependence of the simulated diffusion are discussed and compared to experimental measures and theoretical predictions. The implementation of the molecular dynamics algorithm on a parallel supercomputer is also briefly discussed to illustrate the performance benefits these computers make possible.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 193: Symposium Q – Atomic Scale Calculations of Structure in Materials , 1990 , 333
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Paidar, V., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 92, 115 (1985).Google Scholar
2 . Yost, G., Romig, A. D., and Bourcier, R. J., Sandia Report (SAND88-0946), available from Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1988).Google Scholar
3 Turnbull, D. and Hoffman, R. E., Acta Metall., 2, 419 (1954).Google Scholar
4 Hoffman, R. E., Acta Metall., 4, 97 (1956).Google Scholar
5 Atkinson, A., J. de Physique, 46, C4–379 (1985).Google Scholar
6 Sutton, A. P. and Vitek, V., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 309, 1 and 37 and 55 (1983).Google Scholar
7 Balluffi, R. W., Metall. Trans. A, 13A, 2069 (1982).Google Scholar
8 Brokman, A. and Balluffi, R. W., Acta Metall., 29, 1703 (1981).Google Scholar
9 Biscondi, M., in Physical Chemistry of the Solid State: Applications to Metals and Their Compounds (ed. by LaCombe, P., Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1984), p. 255.Google Scholar
10 Adams, J. B., Foiles, S. M., and Wolfer, W. G., J. Mater. Res., 4, 102 (1989); see also work by M. Nomura, S. Lee, and J. B. Adams in this conference proceedings.Google Scholar
11 Johnson, R. A., Phys. Rev., 134, A1329 (1964).Google Scholar
12 Plimpton, S. J. and Wolf, E. D., Phys. Rev. B, 41, 2712 (1990).Google Scholar
13 Chen, S. P., Voter, A. F., and Srolovitz, D. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 81, 45 (1987).Google Scholar
14 Kwok, T., Ho, P. S., and Yip, S., Phys. Rev. B, 29, 5354 and 5363 (1984).Google Scholar
15 Plimpton, S. J., in Proc. of the 5th Annual Distibuted Memory Computer Conference (DMCCh), Charleston, SC, (published by IEEE) (April 1990).Google Scholar