Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:49:46.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Beam Epitaxy of ZnS Films on Arsenic Passivated Silicon Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Xiaochuan Zhou  and
Wiley P. Kirk
Xiaochuan Zhou
Affiliation:
NanoFAB Center, Engineering-Physics Building, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4242
Wiley P. Kirk
Affiliation:
NanoFAB Center, Engineering-Physics Building, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4242
Get access

Abstract

The crystalline quality of ZnS films grown on arsenic covered Si(100) surfaces is shown to be improved as compared to films grown on bare silicon surfaces by MBE (molecular beam epitaxy). Employing RGA (residual gas analyzer) and RHEED (reflection high energy electron diffraction) techniques, we found that a strong initial adsorption of sulfur on bare silicon surfaces led to the formation of disordered silicon-sulfide surfaces. This disordered surface initiated three-dimensional growth of ZnS and resulted in poor crystalline quality. An arsenic overlayer was found to be effective in preventing the interaction of sulfur with the silicon surface and thereby maintained surface ordering. X-ray rocking curve analysis indicated higher crystallinity in ZnS films grown on arsenic covered surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 318: Symposium Ca – Interface Control of Electrical, Chemical, and Mechanical Properties , 1993 , 207
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Yokoyama, M., Kashiro, K. I., and Ohta, S. I., J. Crystal Growth, 81, 73 (1987).Google Scholar
2 M Park, R. and Mar, H. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 529 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Bringans, R. D., Bieglsen, D. K., Swartz, L.-E., Ponce, F. A., and Tramontana, J. C., Phys. Rev. B 45, 13400 (1992).Google Scholar
4 Weser, T., Bogen, A., Konrad, B., Schnell, R. D., Schug, C. A., and Steinmann, W., in Proc. of the Eighteenth International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors, Stockholm, Sweden, 1986, ed. by Engström, O., World Scientific, Singapore, 1987, pp. 970–100.Google Scholar
5 Henderson, R. C., J. Electronchem. Soc. 119, 772 (1972).Google Scholar
6 Bringans, R. D., CRC Critical Review in Solid State and Materials Sciences 17, 353 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Copel, M., Ruter, M. C., Kaxiras, E., and Tromp, R. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 632 (1989).Google Scholar
8 Depuydt, J. M., Cheng, H., Potts, J. E., Smith, T. L., and Mohapatra, S. K., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 4756 (1987).Google Scholar