Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:57:12.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular Beam Epitaxy Of Si/ZnS/Si(100) Heterostructures For Silicon-Based Quantum Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Xiaochuan Zhou
Affiliation:
NanoFAB Center, Engineering-Physics Building, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843–4242
Feng Li
Affiliation:
NanoFAB Center, Engineering-Physics Building, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843–4242
Gregory F. Spencer
Affiliation:
NanoFAB Center, Engineering-Physics Building, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843–4242
Wiley P. Kirk
Affiliation:
NanoFAB Center, Engineering-Physics Building, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843–4242
Get access

Abstract

Special methods were developed to grow Si/ZnS/Si heterostructures for the purpose of developing silicon-based quantum devices. An arsenic passivation technique was used on silicon surfaces for the growth of ZnS. The effectiveness of this surface passivation was demonstrated by the improved crystal quality and decreased heterostructural interface-state density. A two-step growth method was developed for the epitaxial growth of silicon on ZnS surfaces. In this method the normal silicon epitaxial growth was preceded by a solid phase epitaxy process. Single crystal films of silicon were successfully grown on ZnS surfaces. Our discussion addresses two key issues: crystal defects and the density of interface states. The results of RHEED (reflection high energy electron diffraction), C-V (capacitance voltage), and SIMS (secondary ion mass spectroscopy) measurements are presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Maierhofer, C., Kulkami, S., Alonso, M., Reich, T., and Horn, K., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. B9, 2238 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Zhou, X. and Kirk, W. P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 318, 207212 (1994).Google Scholar
3 Zhou, X., Kirk, W. P., Romano, L. T., and Bringans, R. D., in Proc. of the 22nd Intl. Conf. Phys. of Semicond., Vancouver, Canada, August, 1994, ed. Lockwood, David J., World Scientific, Singapore, Vol.1, 497 (1995).Google Scholar
4 Romano, L. T., Bringans, R. D., Zhou, X., and Kirk, W. P., submitted to Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar
5 Weser, T., Bogen, A., Konrad, B., Schnell, R. D., Schug, C. A., and Steinmann, W., in Proc. of the 18th Intl. Conf. Phys. of Semicond., Stockholm, Sweden, 1986, ed. by Engström, O., World Scientific, Singapore, 970, (1987).Google Scholar
6 Bringans, R. D., Bieglsen, D. K., Swartz, L.-E., Ponce, F. A., and Tramontana, J. C., Phys. Rev. B 45, 13400 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Henderson, R. C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 119, 772 (1972).Google Scholar
8 Bringans, R. D., CRC Critical Review in Solid State and Materials Sciences 17, 353 (1992).Google Scholar
9 DePuydt, J. M., Cheng, H, Potts, J. E., Smith, T. L., and Mohapatra, S. K., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 4756 (1987).Google Scholar
10 Cho, C. -C., Liu, H. Y., Gnade, B. E., and Kim, T. S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 769, (1992).Google Scholar
11 Terman, M. L., Solid-State Electron. 5, 285 (1962).Google Scholar
12 Copel, M., Reuter, M. C., Kaxiras, E., and Tromp, R. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 632 (1989).Google Scholar