Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:37:25.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moisture-Assisted Crack Growth in Polymer Adhesive-Glass Sandwich Geometries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J. E. Ritter
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amherst, MA 01003
T. J. Lardner
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amherst, MA 01003
G. C. Prakash
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amherst, MA 01003
A. J. Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amherst, MA 01003
Get access

Abstract

Moisture-assisted crack growth in polymer/glass interfaces was measured as a function of the applied energy release using a four-point flexure test coupled with an inverted microscope. The specimens consisted of two glass plates bonded together with a thin layer of epoxy adhesive. Roughening the surface of one of the interfaces increased its fracture resistance sufficiently so that crack growth on this interface was inhibited. Thus, crack growth would occur only on the “smooth” interface (one with the least fracture resistance) or in the case where both interfaces were smooth, dual cracking occurred. Finite element analysis was used to explain the observed crack growth results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Conley, K. M., Ritter, J. E., and Lardner, T. J., J. Mater. Res., 7 (9), 2621–29 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Ritter, J. E. and Conley, K. M., Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 12 (4), 245–50 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Cao, H.C. and Evans, A. G., Mech. Mater., 7, 295305 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Liechti, K. M. and Chai, Y. S., ASME J. Appl. Mech., 58, 680–87 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Charamlambides, P. G., Cao, H. C., Lund, J., and Evans, A. G., Mech. Mater., 8, 269–83 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Suo, Z. and Hutchinson, J. W., Mater. Sci. & Eng., A107, 135–43 (1989).Google Scholar