Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:50:40.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Modified Approach to the Modelling of Grain Boundary Structure in Materials with an Hexagonal Crystal Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Ian Maclaren  and
Mark Aindow
Ian Maclaren
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B 15 2TT, England
Mark Aindow
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B 15 2TT, England
Get access

Abstract

The CCSL approach for modelling dislocation configurations in high-angle grain boundaries of hexagonal materials has been re-examined. It has been shown that this model implies the existence of long range strain in both crystals and that the strain energy which would be involved makes the formation of such structures unlikely. It has been proposed that alternative methods could be developed which make no assumptions about the nature of any reference structure adopted by a boundary. If the Burgers vectors of interfacial dislocations are obtained using Pond's symmetry theory of interfacial defects and the arrangement of these defects determined using an ‘0’ lattice approach then the structure of grain boundaries may be modelled irrespective of the nature of the “reference structures”.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 319: Symposia CB – Defect-Interface Interactions , 1993 , 251
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bollmann, W., Crystal defects and Crystalline Interfaces, (Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1970).Google Scholar
2. Bollmann, W., Crystal lattices, Interfaces, Matrices, (Geneva, published privately, 1982).Google Scholar
3. Babcock, S.E. and Balluffi, R.W., Phil. Mag. A, 55, 643 (1987); C.P. Sun and R.W. Balluffi, Phil. Mag. A, 46, 49 (1982); E.P. Kvam and R.W. Balluffi, Phil. Mag. A, 56, 137 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Clark, W.A.T. and Smith, D.A., Phil. Mag. A, 38, 367 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bollmann, W. and Warrington, D.H., in ref. 2, pp. 214–215.Google Scholar
6. Chen, F.-R. and King, A.H., Phil. Mag. A, 57,431 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Shin, K. and King, A.H., Mater. Sci. Eng., A113, 121 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lay, S., Ayed, P. and Nouet, G., Acta Metall. et Mater., 40, 2351 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Lay, S. and Nouet, G., Acta Metall. et Mater., 41, 1511 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Shin, K. and King, A.H., Phil. Mag. A, 63, 1023 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Fletcher, N.H. and Lodge, K.W., in Epitaxial Growth ed. Matthews, J.W., (NYC, Academic press, 1975) p.553.Google Scholar
12. Pond, R.C., Dislocations in Solids, ed. Nabarro, F.R.N., (North Holland), 8, ch. 38 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Chen, F-R. and King, A.H., Metall. Trans., 19A, 2359 (1988).Google Scholar
14. MacLaren, I. and Aindow, M., Scripta Metall. et Mater., 29, 811 (1993).Google Scholar
15. Hirth, J.P. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1968), ch. 19.Google Scholar