Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:37:36.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling the Effects of Evolving Redox Conditions on the Corrosion of Copper Containers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

F. King
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, PinaWa, Manitoba, Canada R0E 1L0
D. M. LeNeveu
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, PinaWa, Manitoba, Canada R0E 1L0
D. J. Jobe
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Vhiteshell Laboratories, PinaWa, Manitoba, Canada R0E 1L0
Get access

Abstract

The corrosive environment around the containers in a Canadian nuclear fuel waste disposal vault will change over time from “warm and oxidizing” to “cool and anoxic”. As the conditions change, so too will the corrosion behaviour of the containers. For copper containers, uniform corrosion and, possibly, pitting will occur during the initial aggressive phase, to be replaced by slow uniform corrosion during the long-term anoxic period.

The corrosion behaviour of copper has been studied over a range of conditions representing all phases in the evolution of the vault environment. The results of these studies are summarized and used to illustrate how a model can be developed to predict the corrosion behaviour and container lifetimes over long periods of time. Lifetimes in excess of 106 a are predicted for 25-mm-thick. copper containers under Canadian disposal conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 King, F., LeNeveu, D.M., Ryan, S.R. and Litke, C.D., in Lifetime Predictions of Corrodible Structures, edited by Parkins, R.N. (NACE International, Houston, TX), to be published.Google Scholar
2 King, F. and LeNeveu, D.M., in Nuclear Waste Packaging. FOCUS ’91 (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, 1992) pp. 253261.Google Scholar
3 Gascoyne, M. and Kamineni, D.C., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-516, C0G-92-24, 1992.Google Scholar
4 Shoesmith, D.W., Ikeda, B.M. and King, F., in NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Modelling Aqueous Corrosion (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht), in press.Google Scholar
5 Shoesmith, D.W., Ikeda, B.M. and King, F., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, edited by Sombret, C.G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 257, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992) pp. 407414.Google Scholar
6 King, F., Litke, C.D. and Ryan, S.R., Corr. Sci. 33, 1979 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Litke, C.D., Ryan, S.R. and King, F., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10397, C0G-91-304, 1992.Google Scholar
8 King, F. and Tang, Y., unpublished results.Google Scholar
9 King, F., Litke, C.D. and Ryan, S.R., in CORROSION 92 (NACE International, Houston, TX, 1992) Paper 119.Google Scholar
10 Lucey, V.F., Brit. Corros. J. 2, 175 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 King, F. and Litke, C.D., Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Reports, AECL-9571 to 9573, 1989, and unpublished results.Google Scholar
12 Deslouis, C., Tribollet, B., Mengoli, G. and Musiani, M.M., J. Appl. Electrochem. 18, 374, 384 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Romanoff, M., Underground Corrosion, NBS Circular 579 (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1957).Google Scholar
14 Bresle, A., Saers, J. and Arrhenius, B., Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Company Technical Report, KBS-TR-83-05, 1983.Google Scholar
15 Simmons, G.R. and Baumgartne, P.r, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10715, COG-93-5, 1994.Google Scholar
16 Swedish Corrosion Institute, Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Company Technical Report, KBS-TR-83-24, 1983.Google Scholar