Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:52:51.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling of Sb Activation in Ultra-shallow Junction Regions in Bulk and Strained Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Yan Lai
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tyndall National Insitute, Electronic Theory Group, Lee Maltings, Prospect Row, Cork, N/A, Ireland, 353-21-4904113
Nicolas Cordero
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tyndall National Institute, Cork, N/A, Ireland
James C Greer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tyndall National Institute, Cork, N/A, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

The activation behaviour of dopants in ultra-shallow junctions on strained silicon is investigated from a simulation vantage point. Process models available in commercial simulation tools are typically developed for junctions formed with high implantation energies (> 50 keV) and for long anneal times. Hence the question arises as to whether these models and parameter sets can accurately predict the active profile for highly doped, ultra-shallow junctions formed thin strained silicon layers using short rapid thermal anneals (RTA, <10 seconds) at temperatures below 800 °C. By incorporating the results from experimental data, we develop modified models allowing for improved predictions of antimony activation within both bulk and strained silicon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bennett, N.S., Cowern, N.E.B., Smith, A.J., Gwilliam, R.M., Sealy, B.J., O'Reilly, L. and McNally, P.J., “Highly conductive Sb-doped layer in strained Si,” Applied Physics Letters, Vol 89, No. 18, Article 182122 (Oct 2006).Google Scholar
2. Larsen, A.N., Pedersen, F.T., Weyer, G., Galloni, R., Rizzoli, R. and Armigliato, A., “The nature of electrically inactive antimony in silicon,” J. Appl. Phys., Vol.59, No. 6, pp. 1908–17, Mar 1986.Google Scholar
3. Trumbore, F.A, “Solid solubilities of impurity elements in germanium and silicon,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 39:205–33 (1960)Google Scholar
4.Synopsys TCAD User Guide, version X-2005.10. (see www.synopsys.com/products/tcad//tcad.html for details).Google Scholar
5.Silvaco Athena User Manual, 2007 (see www.silvaco.com for details).Google Scholar
6. Thomsen, E.V., Hansen, O., Harrekilde-Petersen, K., Hansen, J.L., Shiryaev, S.Y. and Larsen, A.N., “Thermal stability of highly Sb-doped molecular beam epitaxy silicon grown at low temperatures: Structural and electrical characterization,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 3016–22, Sep-Oct 1994.Google Scholar
7. Larsen, A.N., Zangenberg, N. and Fage-Pedersen, J., “The effect of biaxial strain on impurity diffusion in Si and SiGe,” Materials Science and Engineering B, Solid State Materials for Advanced Technology, Vol. 124, Special Issue, pp. 241244, Dec 2005.Google Scholar