Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:42:14.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling Receptor-Ligand Mediated Adhesion in Nanoindentation of Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Zhang Chunyu
Affiliation:
[email protected], National University of Singapore, Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Singapore, 119260, Singapore
Zhang Yongwei
Affiliation:
[email protected], National University of Singapore, Materials Science and Engineering, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, 119260, Singapore
Get access

Abstract

The specific adhesion mediated by receptor-ligand binding in the nanoindentation of cells was studied by using a continuum-kinetics approach. It was found that the adhesion force only causes a shift to the indentation loading curve whereas the unloading curve is tilted downward by the adhesion force, resulting in a hysteresis. Parametric studies were conducted to investigate how experimental conditions influence the adhesion force. It was found that the maximum adhesion force is sensitive to the geometry of the indenter but insensitive to the indentation depth and the mechanical properties of cells. It was also shown that the dependence of the adhesion force on the loading and unloading rates is controlled by the association rate of the receptor-ligand binding, leading to three well-defined regimes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Simon, A. and Durrieu, M.-C., Micron 37, 1(2006).Google Scholar
2. Orsello, C.E., Lauffenburger, D.A. and Hammer, D.A., Trends Biotechnol. 19, 310(2001).Google Scholar
3. Chan, B.M., Kassner, P.D., Schiro, J.A., Byers, H.R., Kupper, T.A. and Helmer, M.E., Cell 68, 1051 (1992).Google Scholar
4. McClay, D.R., Wessel, G.M. and Marchase, R.B., Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 4975(1981).Google Scholar
5. Pierrat, S., Wyart, F.B. and Nassoy, P., Biophys. J. 87, 2855(2004).Google Scholar
6. Sagvolden, G., Giaever, I., Pettersen, E.O. and Feder, J., Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 471(1999).Google Scholar
7. Florin, E.L., Moy, V.T. and Gaub, H.E., Science 264, 425(1994).Google Scholar
8. McNamee, C.E., Pyo, N., Tanaka, S., Vakarelski, I.U., Kanda, Y. and Higashitani, K., Colloids Surfaces B 48,176(2006).Google Scholar
9. Hertz, H.. Reine, J. Angew.Mathematik. 92, 156(1881).Google Scholar
10. Sneddon, I.N.. Int. J. Engng. Sci. 3, 47(1965).Google Scholar
11. Costa, K.D. and Yin, F.C.P., J. Biomech. Eng. 121, 462 (1999).Google Scholar
12. Mathur, A.B., Collinsworth, A.M., Reichert, W.M., Kraus, W.E. and Truskey, G.A., J. Biomech. 34, 1545 (2001).Google Scholar
13. Dembo, M.. Torney, D.C., Saxaman, K. and Hammer, D., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 234, 55(1988).Google Scholar
14. Bell, G.I., Science 200, 618(1978).Google Scholar