Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T11:38:51.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Minority Carrier Diffusion Lengths And Photoconductivity In a-Si,N:H Deposited By Remote Pecvd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

M.J. Williams
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, Materials Science and Engineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27965–8202, USA
S.M. Cho
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, Materials Science and Engineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27965–8202, USA
S.S. He
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, Materials Science and Engineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27965–8202, USA
G. Lucovsky
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, Materials Science and Engineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27965–8202, USA
Get access

Abstract

We have deposited films of a-Si,N:H by remote PECVD from N2 and SiH4 for N-concentrations, [N], to about 12 atomic percent (at. %). Bonded-H concentrations were ∼7–10 at. %, Mostly in Si-H groups. The films with [N] = 9–12 at. % have εθ4 bandgaps of ∼2.0 to 2.2 eV, which makes them potentially useful as wide bandgap photo-active materials in tandem PV cells. Several properties are of special interest for PV applications. First, like many other a-Si:H-based alloys, the photoconductivity relative to a-Si:H is degraded by alloying, but less than for a-Si,C:H alloys with the same bandgaps. Second, the ambipolar diffusion lengths (Ld) obtained with the Steady State Photocarrier Grating (SSPG) technique for films with [N] = 10 at. % and εθ4 = 2.1eV, are comparable to those of a-Si:H. For lightly-nitrided films to [N] ∼5 at. %, Ld first decreases with respect to a-Si:H and then increases as [N] increases from ∼7 at.% to 10–12 at. %. These trends follow the dark conductivity activation energy, Ea, which initially drops due to doping, and then increases into an alloy regime for [N] > 5 at. %. Films with [N1=10 at. % have dark conductivities and Ea's comparable to those of undoped a-Si:H. Third the magnitude of the Staebler-Wronski effect, as monitored by the photo- to dark conductivity ratio after a 1000 Minute lightsoak, was about the same as in a-Si:H. Finally, we contrast the properties of these films prepared from N2 with a-Si,N:H alloys with the same [N] and E04, but prepared from an ammonia N-atom source gas and attribute differences in their photoelectronic behavior such as a significantly enhanced Staebler-Wronski effect.to the presence of Si-NH bonding arrangements in the films grown from NH3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lucovsky, G., Tsu, D.V., Rudder, R.A. and Markunas, R.J. in Thin Film Processes II. edited by Vossen, J.L. and Kern, W. (Academic Press, New York, 1991), p. 565.Google Scholar
2. Parsons, G.N., Tsu, D.V., and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6, 1912 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Wickboldt, P., et al., Philos. Mag. B 64, 655 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Mahan, A.H., Raboisson, P. and Tsu, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 335 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Williams, M.J., Cho, S.M., and Lucovsky, G., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 297, 759 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lucovsky, G., Solid State Commun. 29, 571 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Parsons, G.N. and Lucovsky, G., Phys. Rev. B 41, 1664 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Williams, M.J., Cho, S.M. and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A12 (1994) (in press).Google Scholar
9. Knights, J.C., in The Phvsics of Hvdrogenated AMorphous Silicon I. edited by Joannopolous, J.D. and Lucovsky, G. (Springer-Verlag, Berling, 1984), p. 5.Google Scholar
Knights, J.C. and Lucovsky, G., Crit. Rev. in Solid State and Mat. Sci. 9, 211 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Smith, Z. and Wagner, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 688 (1987).Google Scholar
11. Stutzman, M., Philos. Mag. B 60, 531 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Wffliams, M. J., He, S.S., Cho, S.M., and Lucovsky, G., J. Non-Qyst Solids 164–166, 67 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Li, Y.M., Fieselmann, B.F., and Catalano, A., 22nd IEEE PVSC, 1231 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Yaoobi, B.G., collins, R.W., Moddell, G., VikiDrvto, P. and paul, W., Phys. Rev. B24, 5907, (1981).Google Scholar
15 Yang, L., Baiberg, I., Catalano, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 192, 243 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Alan, D. and Joannopolous, J.D. in The Physics of Hvdrogenated AMorphous Silicon II. edited by Joannopolous, J.D. and Lucovsky, G. (Springer-Verlag, Berling, 1984), p. 5.Google Scholar