Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:41:34.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microwave-Induced Heating of HMX for Decomposition Kinetic Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2012

Amanda L. Duque
Affiliation:
Weapons Experiments Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, U.S.A.
W. Lee Perry
Affiliation:
Weapons Experiments Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We use microwave (MW) absorption to induce rapid, uniform heating of the secondary high explosive octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) for decomposition analysis in a fast kinetic regime (10-2 s). Because HMX alone is MW inactive, composites comprised of an HMX-polymeric binder system doped with a small mass fraction (<1 wt%) multiwalled carbon nanotubes or graphite, were fabricated. The dielectric properties were measured (real and imaginary permittivity between 1 – 18 GHz), which is necessary for describing the expected MW-materials interaction and predicted heating response. The real component of the relative dielectric permittivity ranged from 3 – 4 while the imaginary component was 0.01 – 0.07, depending on the amount of carbon dopant added. Dynamic temperature measurements of a similar explosive composite under MW exposure were accomplished using fiber-optic temperature measurement techniques, and can be reproducibly correlated to the amount of MW energy absorbed in the sample.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Henson, B. F., Asay, B. W., Sander, R. K., et al. ., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1213 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Henson, B. F., Smilowitz, L., Asay, B. W., et al. ., J. Chem. Phys. 117, 3780 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Smilowitz, L., Henson, B. F., Asay, B. W., et al. ., J. Chem. Phys. 117, 3789 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Hasue, K., Tanabe, M., Watanabe, N., et al. ., 15, 181 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Martinelli, M., Rolla, P. A., and Tombari, E., IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 33, 779 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Dube, D. C., Lanagan, M. T., Kim, J. H., et al. ., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 2466 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Glover, B. B., and Perry, W. L., Propellants, Explos., Pyrotech. 34, 347 (2009).Google Scholar
8. Baker-Jarvis, J., Janezic, M. D., and Jones, C. A., IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 47, 338 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Glover, B. B., and Perry, W. L., J. Appl. Phys. 101, 064309 (2007).Google Scholar
10. Higginbotham, A. L., Moloney, P. G., Waid, M. C., et al. ., Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 3087 (2008).Google Scholar
11. Junhua, W. U., J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 24, 661 (2008).Google Scholar