Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:49:53.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Microwave Interferometer for Density Measurement and Stabilization in Process Plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

David I. C. Pearson ,
G. A. Campbell ,
C. W. Domier  and
P. C. Efthimion
David I. C. Pearson
Affiliation:
Plasma and Materials Technologies, Inc., 222 W. Orange Grove Ave., Burbank, CA 91502.
G. A. Campbell
Affiliation:
Plasma and Materials Technologies, Inc., 222 W. Orange Grove Ave., Burbank, CA 91502.
C. W. Domier
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma and Fusion Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024.
P. C. Efthimion
Affiliation:
Princeton Scientific Consultants, P.O. Box 2181, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
Get access

Abstract

A low-cost heterodyne microwave interferometer system capable of measuring and/or controlling the plasma density over a dynamic range covering two orders of magnitude is demonstrated. The microwave frequency is chosen to match the size and density of plasma to be monitored. Large amplitude, high frequency fluctuations can be quantitatively followed and the longer-time-scale density can be held constant over hours of operation, for example during an inline production process to maintain uniformity and stoichiometry of films. A linear relationship is shown between plasma density and discharge current in a specific plasma device. This simple relationship makes control of the plasma straightforward using the interferometer as a density monitor. Other plasma processes could equally well benefit from such density control capability. By combining the interferometer measurement with diagnostics such as probes or optical spectroscopy, the total density profile and the constituent proportions of the various species in the plasma could be determined.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 117: Symposium C – Process Diagnostics: Materials, Combustion, Fusion , 1988 , 311
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Langmuir, I. and Compton, K.T., Rev. Mod. Phys. 3, 191 (1931).Google Scholar
[2] Manos, D. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 1059 (1985).Google Scholar
[3] Hopkins, M. B. and Graham, W. G., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 2210 (1986).Google Scholar
[4] Rossnagel, S. M. and Kaufman, H. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 1822 (1986).Google Scholar
[5] Oshima, M., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 20, 683 (1981).Google Scholar
[6] Coburn, J. and Chen, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. la, 353 (1981).Google Scholar
[7] Shabushing, J. G., Deniko, P. R. and Savage, R. N., MRS Symp. Proc. 38, 77 (1985).Google Scholar
[8] Hosea, J. C., “UHF Plasma Interaction: The Two Stream Instability of a Current Carrying Plasma”, Ph. D. Thesis, Stanford University, Aug. 1966, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
[9] Sicha, M. et al., Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 1511 (1966).Google Scholar
[10] Greenberg, K. E. el al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 299 (1984).Google Scholar
[11] Nasser, E., Fundamentals of Gaseous Ionization and Plasma Electronics, (Wiley-Interscience, NY, 1971) p. 432.Google Scholar
[12] Heald, M. and Wharton, H., Plasma Diagnostics with Microwaves (Kreiger Publishing Co., NY, 1978; First Edition, Wiley, NY 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Fessey, J. A. et al., J Phys E20, 169 (1987).Google Scholar
[14] Efthimion, P. C. et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56, 908 (1985).Google Scholar
[15] Meddens, B.J.H. and Taylor, R.J., Rynhuizen Report 74–85, Association EURATOM-FOM, Jutphaas, The Netherlands (August, 1974).Google Scholar