Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:44:12.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure-Conductivity Relationships in Solid Anisotropic Ionically Conducting Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

E. Butchereit
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Applied Inorganic Chemistry, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5045, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
J. Schoonman
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Applied Inorganic Chemistry, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5045, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
H. W. Zandbergen
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Materials Science, Delft University of Technology, Rotterdamseweg 137, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
C. Lutz-Elsner
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, Daimler Benz AG, Wilhelm-Runge-StraBe 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
M. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, Daimler Benz AG, Wilhelm-Runge-StraBe 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
P. Wang
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, Daimler Benz AG, Wilhelm-Runge-StraBe 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Get access

Abstract

In a randomly oriented polycrystalline ionically conducting material the total conductivity is reduced by the lengthening of the effective conduction pathway which is determined by the microstructure. It is, therefore, desirable to develop a better understanding of the relationship between the conductivity and the microstructure of the ceramic material.

This work focused on the quantification of the various contributions to the overall conductivity. Na-β” alumina ceramics with different microstructures but the same chemical composition were used as samples. Conductivity data were obtained by impedance spectroscopy measurements (IS) carried out in a temperature range from 350 to -30 °C at frequencies from 1 Hz to 500 KHz. An attempt has been made to calculate distinct geometric factors for the specific values of the grain and grain boundary contribution. These were inferred from the sample geometry, Laser Scanning Microscope (LSM) pictures, microstructural observations by image analysis, Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) pictures, and considerations of the current pathways in the anisotropically conducting ceramic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

1. Bauerle, J.E., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 30, 2657 (1969).Google Scholar
2. Armstrong, R.D., Dickinson, T., and Willis, P.M., Electroanal. Chem. 53, 389 (1974)Google Scholar
3. Armstrong, R.D. and Sellick, D.P., Electrochim. Acta 25, 1199 (1980)Google Scholar
4. Wasiucionek, M, Garbarczyk, J., and Jakubowski, W., Solid State Ionics 7, 283 (1982)Google Scholar
5. Archer, W.I., Armstrong, R.D., Sellick, D.P., Budgen, W.J., and Duncan, J.H., J. Mater. Sci. 53, 389 (1974)Google Scholar
6. Lilley, E. and Strutt, J.E., Phys. Status Solidi 54, 639 (1979)Google Scholar
7. Farrington, G.C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 123, 1213 (1976)Google Scholar
8. Virkar, A. V., Miller, G.R., and Gordon, R.S., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 61, 250 (1978)Google Scholar
9. Hunter, C.C., Ingram, M.D., and West, A.R., J. Mater. Sci. Letters 1, 522 (1982)Google Scholar