Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:59:14.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure Studies on Hexagonal Layered Ni-S Nanocrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Xiang-Cheng Sun
Affiliation:
Center for Material for Information Technology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0209. Tel: 205-348-280, Fax: 205-348-2346,*Email:[email protected]
J. Reyes-Gasga
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, National University of Mexico, 04250, D.F. Mexico
J. A. Toledo
Affiliation:
Molecular Engineer, Instituto Mexicano del Petroleo, 07730, D.F. Mexico
Get access

Abstract

Layered nickel-sulfides (Ni-S) nanocrystals had been successfully prepared by lowtemperature hydrothermal approach. Rietveld X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed that these layered Ni-S materials have two different hexagonal structure phases, NiS1.03 and NiS, both phases are NiAs-type with space group of P63/mmc. X-ray energy dispersive spectra (XEDS) analysis and TEM observations also confirmed these two nanocrystals of NiS1.03 and NiS. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HREM) lattice images indicated moiré fringes with rotational or translational patterns were observed in these layered Ni-S nanophases materials. In particular, it was found that all the simulated HREM images were in good agreement with the observed HREM lattice images. Especially, the simulated SAED patterns obtained from the hexagonal Ni-S crystallographic model showed that the experimental SAED patterns taken along [11.0], [00.1] and [10.0] zone axes presented reflections produced by double diffraction effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Trahan, J., Goodrich, R. G. and Watkins, S. F., Phys. Rev. B 2, 2859, (1970).Google Scholar
2. Horwood, J. L., Pipley, L. G., Townsend, M. G. and Tremblay, R. J., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 1476, (1971).Google Scholar
3. Chen, P. and Du, Y.W., Europhys. Lett. 53(3) 360 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Zhang, X. M., Wang, C., Xie, Y. and Qian, Y. T., Mater. Res. Bull., 34, 1967, (1999).Google Scholar
5. Fernadez, A. M., Nari, M. T. and Nair, P. K., Mater. Manuf. Processes 8, 535, (1993).Google Scholar
6. Barthelemy, E. and Gorochov, O., Mater. Res. Bull. 8, 1401, (1973).Google Scholar
7. Coustal, R., J. Chem Phys. 38, 277, (1958).Google Scholar
8. Henshaw, G., Parkin, I. P. and Shaw, G.A., J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2, 231, (1997).Google Scholar
9. Olivas, A., Reyes, J. C., Avalos, M., Petranovskii, V. and Fuentes, S., Mater. Lett. 38, 141 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Biltz, W., Z. Anorg. Chem. 228, 294, (1936).Google Scholar
11. Williams, D. B. and Carter, C. B., Transmission Electron Microscopy, (New York: Plenum Press, 1996) pp. 444.Google Scholar
12. Gasga, J. R., Tehuacanero, S. and Yacaman, M. J., Microscopy Res. Tech., 40, 2, (1998).Google Scholar
13. Vaidya, N., Indian Journal for pure and Applied Physics, 14, 600, (1976).Google Scholar