Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:46:40.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure Control in Iron Aluminides by Phase Decomposition or by Mechanical Alloying for Improved Strength and Ductility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. G. Morris
Affiliation:
Institute of Structural Metallurgy, University of Neuchâtel, Avenue de Bellevaux 51, NEUCHATEL 2000, SWITZERLAND
S. Gunther
Affiliation:
Institute of Structural Metallurgy, University of Neuchâtel, Avenue de Bellevaux 51, NEUCHATEL 2000, SWITZERLAND
Get access

Abstract

The iron aluminides based on Fe3Al or FeAl being developed for intermediate temperature applications suffer from mediocre room temperature strength and ductility and poor high temperature tensile and creep strength. Attempts to overcome these problems have been restricted by the limited possibilities of structure modification by, for example, precipitation of stable strengthening particles. The present study examines two approaches to obtaining two-phase mixtures for improved strength and ductility: by adjusting chemical compositions such that two-phase order-disorder (α-α″) mixtures are obtained, and by mechanical alloying. Two-phase α-α″ mixtures are obtained by heat treatment of Fe-Al alloys with Al content near 20–24% and in ternary Fe-Al-Si alloys with suitably adjusted Al and Si contents. Microstructures of such alloys can be modified during heat treatments by ordering, precipitation or decomposition, and two-phase mixtures similar to those in the γ-γ superalloys obtained. Such two-phase alloys show good high temperature tensile and creep strength with some indication of reasonable ductility and reduced environmental sensitivity. Mechanical alloying can easily produce FeAl alloys of fine grain size reinforced with stable oxide particles. These structures lead to high room temperature strength with some ductility: controlled recrystallization can significantly modify both strength and ductility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. McKamey, C.G., De Van, J.H., Tortorelli, P.F. and Sikka, V.K., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1779 (1991).Google Scholar
2. McKamey, C.G., Maziasz, P.J. and Jones, J.W., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2089 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Stoloff, N.S. and Liu, C.T., Intermetallics 2, 75 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Stoloff, N.S., Castagna, A., Scott, J. and Duquette, D.J., in Processing, Properties and Applications of Iron Aluminides (edited by Schneibel, J.H. and Crimp, M.A.), Proc. TMS Symp., p. 271. TMS, Warrendale, PA (1994).Google Scholar
5. Anton, D.L., in Intermetallic Compounds: Vol. 2, Practice (edited by Westbrook, J.H. and Fleisher, R.L.), p. 3. Wiley, London (1994).Google Scholar
6. Lefort, A., Webb, G., Wolski, K., Lecoze, J., Thevenot, F., Franzoni, U. and Tassa, O., Proc. MATTEC-92, Grenoble, 14–16 October 1992 (edited by Niku-Lari, A.), p. 327. IITT-International, Paris (1992).Google Scholar
7. Baccino, R., San Filippo, D., Moret, F., Lefort, A. and Webb, G., Proc. PM'94, Powder Metallurgy World Congress, Paris, June 1994, Vol. II, p. 1239. Editions de Physique, Les Ulis (1994).Google Scholar
8. Morris, D.G. and Gunther, S., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A208, 7 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Morris, D.G., Peguiron, D., Nazmy, M. and Noseda, C., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A191, 91 (1995).Google Scholar
10. Swann, P.R., Duff, W.R. and Fisher, R.M., Metall. Trans. 3, 409 (1972).Google Scholar
11. Morris, D.G. and Gunther, S., Acta Mater. 44, 2847 (1996).Google Scholar
12. Briguet, Ch. and Morris, D.G., unpublished work.Google Scholar
13. Baker, I., Xiao, H., Klein, O., Nelson, C. and Whittenberger, J.D., Acta Metall. et Mater. 43, 1723 (1995).Google Scholar
14. Yoshimi, K., Hanada, S. and Yoo, M.H., Intermetallics 4, 159 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Gaydosh, D.J., Draper, S.L., Noebe, R.D. and Nathal, M.V., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A150, 7 (1992).Google Scholar
16. Gaydosh, D.J., Draper, S.L. and Nathal, M.V., Metall. Trans. A20, 1701 (1989).Google Scholar
17. Tassa, O., Testani, C., Bocher, P. and Lefort, A., Proc. Materials Development in Rail, Tire, Wing, Hull Transportation, Genoa, 22–24 September, 1992, Elsevier Applied Science, London, p. 2.101.Google Scholar
18. Xiao, H. and Baker, I., Scr. Metall. et Mater. 28, 1411 (1993).Google Scholar
19. Morris, M.A. and Morris, D.G., Acta Metall. 38, 551 (1990).Google Scholar
20. Arzt, E., Res. Mech. 31, 399 (1991).Google Scholar
21. Testani, C., DiGianfrancesco, A. and Tassa, O., reported at ASM/TMS Symposium on Nickel and Iron Aluminides: Processing, Properties, and Applications, Cincinnati, 7–10 October, 1996.Google Scholar
22. Park, J.W. and Moon, I.G., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A152, 341 (1992).Google Scholar
23. Jung, H.C., Lee, C.S. and Park, C.G., Scripta Mater. 35, 1041 (1996).Google Scholar
24. Vyas, S., Viswanathan, S. and Sikka, V.K., Scripta Metall. et Mater. 27, 185 (1992).Google Scholar
25. Sikka, V.K., Viswanathan, S. and Vyas, S., in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys V (edited by Baker, I., Darolia, R., Whittenberger, J.D. and Yoo, M.H.), Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp., Vol. 288, p. 971 (1993).Google Scholar
26. Miyazaki, T., Kozakai, T. and Tsuzuki, T., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 2557 (1986).Google Scholar
27. Morris, D.G. and Gunther, S., Acta Mater, in press.Google Scholar