Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T14:58:42.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Microstructural Investigation into the Effect of the Ambient Atmosphere on Chromium/Polyimide Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S.R. Peddada
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
I.M. Robertson
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
H.K. Birnbaum
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes the effect of the ambient atmosphere (air, vacuum and deuterium) during thermal cycling on chromium/polyimide (Cr/PI) interfaces. Cross-section TEM has been employed to reveal the interface microstructure and morphology. The extent of interdiffusion across the metal/polyimide interface was determined by Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy in the STEM. The nature of the mechanical failure was identified by SEM and the locus of failure determined by Auger Electron Spectroscopy. It was observed that in the Cr/Cu/Cr/PI/Si system, tensile cracks form in the metal layers that originate at the Cr/PI interface after thermal cycling in any of the ambient atmosphere. Also, after annealing, the Cr/PI interface remains sharp, with no significant diffusion of Cr across the interface, irrespective of the ambient atmosphere.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ho, P.S., Haight, R., White, R.C. and Silverman, B.D., J. de Physique, Colloq. C5, 49 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Goldberg, M.J., Clabes, J.C., Viehbeck, A and Kovac, C.A., in Electronic Packaging Materials Science III, edited by Jaccodine, R., Jackson, K.A. and Sundahl, R.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 108. Pittsburgh, PA 1988) pp 225232.Google Scholar
3. Tromp, R.M., Legoues, F. and Ho, P.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol A, 3, no.3, 782 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hahn, P.O., Rubloff, G.W., Bartha, J.W., Legoues, F., Tromp, R. and Ho, P.S., in Electronic Packaging Materials Science, edited by Giess, E.A., Tu, K. -N. and Uhlman, D.R., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 40, Pittsburgh, PA 1985) pp 251263.Google Scholar