Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:12:16.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Evolution and Defects in Ultra-thin SIMOX Materials during Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jun Sik Jeoung
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A.
Rachel Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A.
Supapan Seraphin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The microstructure of ultra-thin SIMOX depends strongly on implantation dose, energy and annealing conditions. We used TEM combined with AES and RBS to determine the microstructural evolution of SIMOX wafers subjected to various temperatures during annealing. We found that an optimum dose window to produce a continuous buried oxide layer without Si islands is 3.0-3.5×1017 O+/cm2 for 100 keV. The thickness of the silicon overlayer and BOX layer produced in this dose window was about 170 nm and 75 nm respectively. RBS analysis showed that a high quality crystalline Si layer was produced after annealing at 1350 °C for 4 hrs. The defect density was very low (< 300/cm2) for all samples implanted at 100 keV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ploβl, A. and Kurauter, G., Solid-State Electronics, 44 775 (2000)Google Scholar
2. Cristoloveanu, S. and Li, S.S., “Electrical Characterization of Silicon-On-Insulator materials and Devices”, Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995 Google Scholar
3. Nakashima, S., IEICE Trans. Electron., E80-C [3] 364 (1997)Google Scholar
4. Li, Y., Kilner, J.A., Chater, R.J., Hemment, P.L.F., Nejim, A., Robinson, A.K., Reeson, K.J., Marsh, C.D. and Booker, G.R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 140 1780 (1993)Google Scholar
5. Anc, M.J., Blake, J.G. and Nakai, T., Electrochem. Soc. Proc. 99-3 51 (1999)Google Scholar
6. Jiao, J., Johnson, B., Seraphin, S., Anc, M.J., Dolan, R.P. and Cordts, B.F., Mat. Sci. Eng., B72 150 (2000)Google Scholar
7. Weber, R. and Skorupa, W., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., B 149 99 (1999)Google Scholar
8. Reiss, S. and Heinig, K.H., Nucl. Instr. and Meth., B 84 229 (1994)Google Scholar
9. Giles, L.F., Nejim, A. and Hemment, P.L.F., Mat. Chem. And Phys. 35 129 (1993)Google Scholar