Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:34:15.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Characterization of Copper Thin Films on Metallic Underlayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

E. M. Zielinski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
R. P. Vinci
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
J. C. Bravman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

Grain size distribution and texture of thin films of sputtered copper were characterized as a function of underlayer choice, deposition temperature and annealing temperature. For Cu deposited on Ta at room temperature and annealed at 100, 150, 200 and 250 °C, abnormal growth of the (100) orientation was observed for annealing temperatures above 150 °C, resulting in a bimodal grain size distribution. This orientation was also seen to grow abnormally for films deposited and annealed under identical conditions, but with a W underlayer. (100) growth for this case was observed at annealing temperatures as low as 100 °C. Abnormal grain growth was suppressed for Cu deposited on Ta at 150 °C and annealed to 250 °C. A bimodal grain size distribution was observed in a similar sample deposited on W under identical conditions, however, the abnormally growing orientation for this case was observed to be the (111) orientation, not the (100) orientation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nitta, T., Ohmi, T., Otsuki, M., Takewaki, T. and Shibata, T., J. Electrochem. Soc. 139 922 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Tao, J., Cheung, N.W. and Hu, C., IEEE El. Dev. Lett. 14 249 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Pai, P.-L. and Ting, C.H., VMIC Conf. Proc. 258 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Li, J., Shacham-Diamand, Y., Mayer, J.W. and Colgan, E.G., VMIC Conf. Proc. 8 153 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Holloway, K. and Fryer, P., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 181 41 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Thompson, C.V., Script. Met. et Mat. 28 167 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Cho, J. and Thompson, C.V., J. Elect. Mat. 19 1207 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Knorr, D.B. and Rodbell, K.P., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 309 345 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Vinci, R.P. and Bravman, J.C., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 308 337 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Thompson, C.V., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 20 245 (1990).Google Scholar
11. McLean, M. and Gale, B., Philosophical Magazine 20 1033 (1969).Google Scholar