Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:57:51.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micromagnetic and Magnetoresistance Studies of Ferromagnetic La0.83Sr0.13MnO2.98 Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Guerman Popov ,
Sergei V. Kalinin ,
Rodolfo A. Alvarez ,
Martha Greenblatt  and
Dawn A. Bonnell
Guerman Popov
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Sergei V. Kalinin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
Rodolfo A. Alvarez
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
Martha Greenblatt
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
Dawn A. Bonnell
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, USA
Get access

Abstract

Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to investigate the surface topography and micromagnetic structure of La0.83Sr0.13MnO2.98 single crystals with colossal magnetoresistance (CMR). The crystals were grown by fused salt electrolysis and characterized by chemical analysis, X-ray diffraction, magnetic and transport measurements. The crystals are rhombohedral (R 3 c). Magnetic and transport measurements indicate that the ferromagnetic ordering at 310 K is associated with an insulator-metal transition at the same temperature. A maximum negative magnetoresistance (-62 %) is observed at 290 K in an applied magnetic field of 5 T. The magnetoresistance increases in magnitude sharply (1.8 %), comparing to the rest of the change, with increasing magnetic field up to 20 G, and then it increases slowly with increasing field.

MFM and AFM were used to study the (110) surface as well as a number of unspecified surfaces. Surface topography of an as-grown crystal exhibits well-developed surface corrugations due to extensive twinning. The corrugation angle at twin boundaries can be related to the unit cell parameters, surface and twinning planes. Magnetic force microscopy images show that magnetic domain boundaries are pinned to the crystallographic twins; a small number of unpinned boundaries are observed. The statistical analysis of domain boundary angle distribution is consistent with cubic magnetocrystalline anisotropy with easy axis along [100] directions for this material. Unusual magnetization behavior in the vicinity of topological defects on the surface is also reported. MFM contrast was found to disappear above the ferromagnetic Curie temperature; after cooling a new magnetic structure comprised of Bloch walls of opposite chiralities developed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 658: Symposium GG – Solid-State Chemistry of Inorganic Materials III , 2000 , GG5.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sun, J.Z., Gupta, A., Annual Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 29 (1998) and References therein.Google Scholar
2. McCarroll, W.H., Ramanujachary, K.V., Fawcett, I., and Greenblatt, M., J. Solid State Chem. 145, 88 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Déchamps, M., Guevara, A.M. de Leon, Pinsard, L. and Revcolevschi, A., Philosophical Magazine A 80(1), 119 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Cherepanov, V.A., Barkhatova, L.Yu., and Voronin, V.I., J. Solid State Chem. 134, 38 (1997).Google Scholar
5. Maignan, A., Caignaert, V., Simon, Ch., Hervieu, M. and Raveau, B., J. Mater. Chem. 5(7), 1089 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Osofsky, M.S., Nadgorny, B., Soulen, R.J. Jr, Broussard, P., Rubinstein, M., Byers, J., Laprade, G., Mukovskii, Y.M., Shulyatev, D., and Arsenov, A., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5567 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Abdelmoula, N., Guidara, K., Cheikh-Rouhou, A., and Dhari, E. and Joubert, J.C., J. Solid State Chem. 151, 139 (2000).Google Scholar
8. McCarroll, W.H., Ramanujachary, K.V., Greenblatt, M., and Cosandey, F., J. Solid State Chem. 136, 322 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Licci, F., Turilli, G., Ferro, P., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 164, L268 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Larson, A.C. and Dreele, R.B. Von, General Structure Analysis System (GSAS), Los Alamos National Laboratories, Report LAUR 86–748 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Töpfer, J. and Goodenough, J.B., J. Solid State Chem. 130, 117 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Scanning Probe Microscopy: Theory, Techniques and Applications, Ed. Bonnell, D.A., Wiley VCH, 2000.Google Scholar