Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:12:05.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micro- to Nano-scale Structure and Drug Release Behavior of Solutions and Hydrogels of Poly (lactide)-Poly (ethylene oxide)-Poly (lactide) Triblock Copolymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Sarvesh Kumar Agrawal
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Chemical Engineering, 686, North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, United States, 413-577-2593
Naomi Sanabria-DeLong
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Polymer Science and Engineering, United States
Pete R. Jemian
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Frederick Seitz Materials Research Laboratory, United States
Jeannine M. Coburn
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Chemical Engineering, United States
Gregory N. Tew
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Polymer Science and Engineering, United States
Surita R. Bhatia
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Chemical Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

We have performed for the first time a complete structural characterization of PLA-PEO-PLA in the solution and hydrogel states. Previous studies on hydrogels of these polymers have shown that these gels have excellent mechanical properties suitable for possible application in tissue engineering and drug delivery. We have performed SANS, USAXS and confocal microscopy to relate the change in micro to nano scale self-assembled structure of these polymers in aqueous solution with changes in the block length and stereospecificity of the PLA block. A significant difference in structure and association behavior was seen between the polymers made from amorphous D/L-lactide as compared to those with crystalline L lactide blocks. In the former case spherical micelles were seen to form whereas the latter forms nonspherical polydisperse micellar assemblies. Both polymers form an associative network structure at higher concentrations, leading to gelation. USAXS and confocal microscopy show the presence of large-scale fractal aggregates in the hydrogels of these polymers. The fractal structure was denser for the L lactide series polymers as compared to the D/L-lactide series polymers. These results show that we can tune the microstructure and thereby the mechanical strength of these gels depending upon the specific application we need it for. We also show profiles for release of hydrophobic drug sulindac from 5 weight% solutions of these polymers in phosphate buffer saline. The profiles follows an almost zero order release behavior that continues slowly and steadily over several days and is again found to be strongly dependent on the crystallinity and molecular weight of the PLA block.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Kubies, D.; Rypacek, F.; Kovarova, J.; Lednicky, F. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 529536.Google Scholar
(2) Kricheldorf, H. R.; Meierhaack, J. Makromolekulare Chemie-Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 1993, 194, 715725.Google Scholar
(3) Li, Y. X.; Volland, C.; Kissel, T. Journal of Controlled Release 1994, 32, 121128.Google Scholar
(4) Kissel, T.; Li, Y. X.; Unger, F. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2002, 54, 99134.Google Scholar
(5) Li, S. M.; Rashkov, I.; Espartero, J. L. et al. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 5762.Google Scholar
(6) Rashkov, I.; Manolova, N.; Li, S. M. et al. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 5056.Google Scholar
(7) Molina, I.; Li, S. M.; Martinez, M. B.; Vert, M. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 363369.Google Scholar
(8) Lee, C. W.; Kang, Y. G.; Jun, K. Korea Polymer Journal 2001, 9, 8491.Google Scholar
(9) Jeong, B.; Kibbey, M. R.; Birnbaum, J. C. et al. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 8317–322.Google Scholar
(10) Aamer, K. A.; Sardinha, H.; Bhatia, S. R.; Tew, G. N. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 10871093.Google Scholar
(11) Agrawal, S. K.; Sanabria-DeLong, N.; Coburn, J. M.; Bhatia, S. R.; Tew, G. N. Journal of Controlled Release Accepted.Google Scholar
(12) Sanabria-DeLong, N.; Agrawal, S. K.; Bhatia, S. R.; Tew, G. N. In preparation.Google Scholar
(13) Xu, J. T.; Fairclough, J. P. A. et al. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2003, 13, 27402748.Google Scholar
(14) Schmidt, P. W. Journal of Applied Crystallography 1991, 24, 414435.Google Scholar
(15) Crichton, M.; Bhatia, S. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2003, 36, 652655.Google Scholar
(16) Pakstis, L. M.; Ozbas, B. et al. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 312318.Google Scholar