Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:20:34.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Method for Measuring the Self-Cementing Characteristics of Fly Ash Pastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. I. A. Malek
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
D. M. Roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Summary

The development of an improved method of trimethylsilylation [1] made possible the assessment of different polysilicate fractions in hydrated cement pastes, as a means of structural characterization. Several laboratories have presented various gas-liquid chromatographic data on the polysilicate derivatives of C-S-H [2–5]. Identification of the different molecular weight fractions has been made, in most laboratories, by matching the gasliquid chromatographic peaks with the gel permeation chromatographic peaks. The success of this matching process is always dependent on type of instruments, length of columns and temperature range.

In the present investigation, a mass spectrometer, in direct contact with the gas-liquid chromatograph, was used to identify the molecular weight of each of the fractions separated from the chromatograph. The technique was applied to determine the molecular weights and abundances of different polysilicate species in hydrated fly ash pastes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tamas, F.D., Sarkar, A.K. and Roy, D.M., in Hydraulic Cement Pastes: Their Structure and Properties (Cement and Concrete Assn., Slough, England, 1976) p. 55.Google Scholar
2. Lachowski, E.E., Cem. Concr. Res. 9, 337 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Sarkar, A.K. and Roy, D.M., Cem. Concr. Res. 9, 343 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Parrott, L.J. and Young, F.J., Cem. Concr. Res. 11, 11 (1971).Google Scholar
5. Mohan, K. and Taylor, H.F.W., Cem. Concr. Res., in press.Google Scholar
6. Uchikawa, H. and Furuta, R., Cem. Concr. Res., 11, 65 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Shimono, T., Isobe, T. and Tarutani, T., J. Chromatogr. 179, 323 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Glasser, L.S.Dent, Lachowski, E.E., Mohan, K. and Taylor, H.F.W., Cem. Concr. Res. 8, 733 (1978).Google Scholar