Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:04:36.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Metals/Materials Dichtomy: Real or Apparent?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

I. M. Bernstein*
Affiliation:
Head and Professor, Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15215
Get access

Abstract

Some of the reasons for and the developing impact of the rapid broadening of the field of materials are presented and the impact of the concomitant shift away from the domination of metals on education and research is assesed. Both the opportunities presented by this view of the materials spectrum and the inherent dangers of over reaction and hyperbole are presented.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hondros, E.D., in Future Development in Technology: The Year 2000 (Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., U.K., 1985) p. 105.Google Scholar
2. Ashby, M.F., The Science of Engineering Materials, prepared for the NATO Science Committee 20th Anniversary Conference.Google Scholar
3. Steiner, J.E. in The Bridge-National Academy of Engineering Winter 198/1983.Google Scholar
4. Report on Artificially Structured Materials (National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1985).Google Scholar
5. Report in Trends and Opportunities in Materials Research (National Science Foundation, Washington D.C., 1984).Google Scholar
6. N.Y. Times Survey on Projected Employment Changes, June 1982.Google Scholar
7. N.Y. Times Survey off High Technology, February 1983.Google Scholar