Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:51:23.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metal Oxide / Silicon Heterostructures: New Solutions for Different Optoelectronic Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. Malik
Affiliation:
FCT-UNL/CEMOP-UNINOVA, Monte de Caparica, Portugal.
R. Martins
Affiliation:
FCT-UNL/CEMOP-UNINOVA, Monte de Caparica, Portugal.
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we report the success in fabricating FTO/Si surface-barrier photodiodes produced by spray pyrolysis deposition technique, under ambient conditions. Three types of photodetectors for low-voltage-bias operation were developed based on high-resistivity silicon: 1. X-Ray detectors with energy resolution of 16.5% at 661.5 keV (137Cs source), consisting of surface-barrier PIN photodiode with an active area of 50 mm2 operating at 5V reverse bias, scintillator based on monocrystalline Bi4Ge3O12 and preamplifier (noise of 250 e RMS.); 2. Fastresponse surface-barrier FTO/I n-n+ silicon epitaxial photodiodes, operating at 10 V bias with rise times of 2 ns at λ = 0.85 μm; 3. Radiation-resistant drift epitaxial surface-barrier PIN photodiodes for unbiased operating conditions, with an exponential impurity distribution in a 8 μm thick epitaxial layer. A built-in electrical field due to the carrier concentration distribution in the epitaxial layer provides a considerable improvement in the “critical fluence” value (3× 1014 cm−2 ) for neutron irradiation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ghandi, Sorab K., in VLSI Fabrication principles (Wiley, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
2. Sze, S. M., Semiconductor Devices Physics and Technology (Wiley, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
3. Parker, D. G. and Say, P. G., Electron. Letters 22, 1266 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Kato, H., Kanda, T., Yasuda, K., Yoshida, A. and Arizumi, T., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 42, 769 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Fujinaka, M., Machi, Y., Kato, T. and Nakano, N., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 16, 2211 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Fonstad, C. G., Microelectronic Devices and Circuits (McGray-Hill, Singapore, 1994), p. 647.Google Scholar
7. Yu, A. Y. C. and Snow, E. H., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3008 (1968).Google Scholar
8. Bilton, C., Hedges, S., Hobson, P. R. and Imrie, D. C., J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 21, 809 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Grove, A. S., Roder, A. and Sah, C. T., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 802 (1965).Google Scholar
10. Shur, M., Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1990).Google Scholar