Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:46:59.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metal Adhesion to <100> Si Substrates with Varying Surface Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Nicholas Barbosa III
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 5 E. Packer Ave., Bethlehem PA;
Rodney S. Ridley Sr
Affiliation:
Fairchild Semiconductor, 125 Crestwood Rd., Mountaintop, PA
Christopher H. Strate
Affiliation:
Fairchild Semiconductor, 125 Crestwood Rd., Mountaintop, PA
Robert S. Dwyer
Affiliation:
Fairchild Semiconductor, 125 Crestwood Rd., Mountaintop, PA
Thomas Grebs
Affiliation:
Fairchild Semiconductor, 125 Crestwood Rd., Mountaintop, PA
Richard P. Vinci
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 5 E. Packer Ave., Bethlehem PA;
Get access

Abstract

Adhesion in multi-layer thin film structures was measured using the four-point bend technique. The investigation primarily focused on layers found in the backside metalization processes of Power MOSFETs (typically in a DMOSFET or U-MOSFET structure). Variation in metal layer and substrate condition produced changes in the adhesion behavior of the systems of interest. Pt, Cu, and Ti metals were applied to Si and SiO2 surfaces with various roughnesses in order to establish the relative contributions of surface chemistry and roughness variation. G values ranging from 2 – 100 J/m2 were measured and it was found that variation in surface chemistry has a larger impact than roughness on the adhesion strength of the systems investigated. The four-point bend adhesion test was determined to be adequate for the measurement of weak to intermediate adhesion of metals on Si wafers with RMS roughness values on the order of the metal film thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1.] Dauskardt, R. H., Lane, M., Ma, Q., Krishna, N., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 1998, 141162.Google Scholar
[2.] Chalker, P. R., Bull, S. J., Rickerby, D. S., Mater.Sci.Eng., A 1991, A140 583592.Google Scholar
[3.] Ma, Q., Fujimoto, H., Flinn, P., Jain, V., Adibi-Rizi, F., Moghadam, F., Dauskardt, R. H., Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 1995, 391 9196.Google Scholar
[4.] Ma, Q., Bumgarner, J., Fujimoto, H., Lane, M., Dauskardt, R. H., Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 1997, 473 314.Google Scholar
[5.] Charalambides, P. G., Lund, J., Evans, A. G., McMeeking, R. M., J.Appl.Mech. 2000, 111 7782.Google Scholar
[6.] Lane, M., Dauskardt, R. H., Vainchtein, A., Gao, H., J.Mater.Res. 2000, 15 27582769.Google Scholar
[7.] Lane, M., Dauskardt, R. H., Krishna, N., Hashim, I., J.Mater.Res. 2000, 15 203211.Google Scholar